![[DEV] ISFL Forums](http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/images/emerald/logo.png "[DEV] ISFL Forums"){kind=logo}
+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Announcements (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=495)
+--- Forum: Announcements (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Forum: Head Office Announcements (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=230)
+---- Thread: Major Announcement (/showthread.php?tid=1157)
Major Announcement - Anti-Hype - 06-15-2017
(06-15-2017, 10:28 AM)Perkules Wrote:You would complain regardless.:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Major Announcement - Anti-Hype - 06-15-2017
All of this bitching could have been words for an article.
Major Announcement - Admin - 06-15-2017
(06-15-2017, 08:58 AM)701 Wrote:So why can graphics not get some love?It is being discussed
I'm not here for critique when it comes to my grade, it shouldn't even be 1/2 as strict
http://nsfl.jcink.net/index.php?showtopic=1182&st=14
They're working on it.
Major Announcement - Grapehead - 06-15-2017
(06-15-2017, 01:46 PM)Anti-Hype Wrote:All of this bitching could have been words for an article.:lol:
Major Announcement - ADwyer87 - 06-15-2017
I would hope everyone would understand that when a guy loses $450,000 on sigs that both look worthy of a 5 on what was likely hours of work that he is going to be pissed haha.
And i dont want to throw a bunch of shade or anything, but there was a sig graded by NUCK as well that was literally a render, a background, and some text, and that got a 4. I dont think theres anything wrong with that, especially if he was really a new graphics guy, but if we want to be relaxed its not fair to give one guy a break because hes new, and then judge ridiculously hard because he's experienced
Major Announcement - Grapehead - 06-15-2017
(06-15-2017, 02:34 PM)ADwyer87 Wrote:I would hope everyone would understand that when a guy loses $450,000 on sigs that both look worthy of a 5 on what was likely hours of work that he is going to be pissed haha.I agree that a person's experience shouldn't affect their grade. That doesn't seem fair.
And i dont want to throw a bunch of shade or anything, but there was a sig graded by NUCK as well that was literally a render, a background, and some text, and that got a 4. I dont think theres anything wrong with that, especially if he was really a new graphics guy, but if we want to be relaxed its not fair to give one guy a break because hes new, and then judge ridiculously hard because he's experienced
Major Announcement - timeconsumer - 06-15-2017
(06-15-2017, 01:44 PM)Grapehead Wrote:I agree that a person's experience shouldn't affect their grade. That doesn't seem fair.
It's a tough road either way to be sure. I know nothing about graphics but let's take my analytical media piece I submitted as an example. Sure I know some statistics (nothing too crazy) and lots about spreadsheets and analytics, so for me to do that kind of a data piece isn't an all-day project (still takes time and effort though).
Now let's say another guy wants to talk analysis and doesn't really have the same experience but still puts forth a lot of effort in data collection, figures out an appropriate methodology, and has a little trial and error. He ends up doing an analysis on what wide receivers are the most consistent week-to-week by comparing their standard deviation, a rather simple metric by analytical standards but something he worked really hard on and still provides really interesting results.
That might take me 20 minutes, it could take a beginner hours depending how long they spent researching proper methodologies for their piece. I'd hate to see him measured using the same yardstick as me just because I do this for a living.
Major Announcement - WinstonKodogo - 06-15-2017
For the picture grading, perhaps an appeal process for those who feel as if they have been judged harshly where they can voice their concerns in a clear manner to the grading team who can then reflect on the decision and have the head graders decision be final.