![]() |
kckolbe punishment - Printable Version +- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums) +-- Forum: League Office (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Punishments (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=279) +--- Thread: kckolbe punishment (/showthread.php?tid=11200) |
kckolbe punishment - YoungTB - 12-03-2018 Yeah but Kolbe didn’t “leak” info. Only justification you can make for leaking would be with Baltimore’s pick. Kolbe gave good reasoning as to why he chose each pick. And if this was such a big problem, why wasn’t this article taken down in the first place? kckolbe punishment - Rindiee - 12-03-2018 pour one out for the man kckolbe punishment - YoungTB - 12-03-2018 (12-04-2018, 12:35 AM)To12143 Wrote:I'll give something from my point of view. Hawks did not make the Maddox pick public, and Slm told me, muford, and kolbe who they were planning at 2, along with his locker room iirc. Kolbe then said that Hawks said it publicly, after the draft had started, which is leaking a pick. Even if it had been known before hand, which it wasn't, it would still be leaking a pick from a member of a war room. This isn't the only evidence either.By locker room, I assume you mean war room? Alright I can understand the Baltimore pick, which maybe was leaking, but the rest of the points of evidence Bovo outlines are huge reaches. kckolbe punishment - caltroit_red_flames - 12-03-2018 @bovovovo wtf I specifically told you not to become a snake when you joined HO and here we are with you fucking slithering around and going "hisssss" Proof: http://nsfl.jcink.net/index.php?showtopic=...ndpost&p=161388 kckolbe punishment - bovovovo - 12-03-2018 (12-04-2018, 12:36 AM)YoungTB Wrote:Yeah but Kolbe didn’t “leak” info. Only justification you can make for leaking would be with Baltimore’s pick. Kolbe gave good reasoning as to why he chose each pick. Knowing the results of the draft and then providing advice about said draft is leaking info. We decided not to take the article down because it was written the same time as a few other mock draft articles, and deleting this one particular one would have inevitably caused some commotion when kolbe or someone else realized it. Which likely would have resulted in people realizing that the article was a leak and then everyone would know how the draft went. As-is only people who knew kolbe was in a war room were able to accurately guess that his mock draft was a leak (which HO has evidence of different users in the league making that connection). Read about the Streissand Effect kckolbe punishment - Oles - 12-03-2018 (12-04-2018, 12:39 AM)YoungTB Wrote:By locker room, I assume you mean war room? No, slm did tell me that he told his locker room as well, which is perfectly fine for his own pick, since he said before hand that Maddox was their number 1. There was also a past punishment that was similar in that it could have been determined to not be leaking, but was punished as such. He's free to appeal of course. kckolbe punishment - AsylumParty - 12-03-2018 (12-04-2018, 12:39 AM)YoungTB Wrote:By locker room, I assume you mean war room?You wouldn't agree that the context is different when someone with post-draft knowledge nudges you in the right direction, as opposed to someone without that same knowledge? You can't *assume* that everyone will be able to come to logical conclusions about the draft order. kckolbe punishment - LGMForever - 12-03-2018 Article is called “Without illegal information” though kckolbe punishment - Beaver - 12-03-2018 I can't believe HO is punishing kolbe's article and not this one. In what world does that make any sense? I hope kolbe appeals this. kckolbe punishment - Moosecop - 12-03-2018 I'm F5ing so hard |