![[DEV] ISFL Forums](http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/images/emerald/logo.png "[DEV] ISFL Forums"){kind=logo}
+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+---- Thread: The future of the NSFL (/showthread.php?tid=1945)
The future of the NSFL - Jiggly_333 - 07-09-2017
OC is on the Pacific. Do you know where Anaheim is? UC Irvine?
Also three conferences don't work. I know that for a fact.
The future of the NSFL - ErMurazor - 07-09-2017
(07-09-2017, 04:33 PM)RainDelay Wrote:Oh true, I kinda forgot about them
Why the fuck were they in the Atlantic lol
lol
The future of the NSFL - 124715 - 07-09-2017
(07-09-2017, 05:54 PM)kckolbe Wrote:Hey there. Since you aren't done, I have a few thoughts.
I'd love to see how the wave of free agency after season three affects contract rules.
I would also wonder how the season length would be affected with more teams. With only 6 teams, 14 games seemed like way too many. But how many teams would it take to consider a longer season?
Should fullback be an actual position? If so, would it be allowed as a TE template, RB, or both?
You addressed position switches, but maybe a discount for "closer" positions? If so, should template matter?
- For example, should a switch from vertical threat TE to red zone threat WR cost that much?
- What if the TE is a blocking TE? In that case, should a switch to a pass-blocking O-lineman be the least expensive?
- Should these minor changes in role not only cost less, but also allow less point shuffles?
By allowing position switches to be made in small ways for very little, a player has more room to "evolve" rather than be overhauled. This would make it easier for users to stay attached to a player.
To be honest, the position bit might be worth its own article. Up for a collaboration?
Thanks for your feedback! I am still learning :towel: and I would love to collaborate with you :dance:
The future of the NSFL - 124715 - 07-09-2017
(07-09-2017, 06:49 PM)Jiggly_333 Wrote:OC is on the Pacific. Do you know where Anaheim is? UC Irvine?
Also three conferences don't work. I know that for a fact.
Yep, I'm stupid. Thought it was in Florida for some reason :blink: :angry: :facepalm:
Edit: I'm thinking of the one I've been to, Orlando's Orange County. I didn't know the Otters were in California
:facepalm:
The future of the NSFL - timeconsumer - 07-09-2017
(07-09-2017, 07:24 PM)ErMurazor Wrote:The Otters should be in the Pacific. You can't break up the rivalry and Orange County is pretty "Pacific"
Maybe he thought we were in Orange County Florida? Orange County New York?
The future of the NSFL - 124715 - 07-09-2017
(07-09-2017, 07:59 PM)timeconsumer Wrote:Maybe he thought we were in Orange County Florida? Orange County New York?
I did :facepalm:
The future of the NSFL - ErMurazor - 07-09-2017
(07-09-2017, 05:59 PM)timeconsumer Wrote:Maybe he thought we were in Orange County Florida? Orange County New York?
I'm more concerned with the rivalries than the locations being accurate!
The future of the NSFL - 124715 - 07-09-2017
(07-09-2017, 08:11 PM)ErMurazor Wrote:I'm more concerned with the rivalries than the locations being accurate!
Fixed it, don't you worry
The future of the NSFL - ErMurazor - 07-09-2017
(07-09-2017, 06:16 PM)124715 Wrote:Fixed it, don't you worry
My man.
The future of the NSFL - 124715 - 07-09-2017
(07-09-2017, 08:17 PM)ErMurazor Wrote:My man.
:cheers: