![]() |
Kansas City Appeal - Printable Version +- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums) +-- Forum: League Office (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Punishments (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=279) +---- Forum: Appeals Decisions (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=472) +---- Thread: Kansas City Appeal (/showthread.php?tid=25747) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Kansas City Appeal - manicmav36 - 09-18-2020 (09-18-2020, 11:26 AM)slate Wrote: I get that we still want to keep those people involved but enforcing meaningless forum activity probably isn't the best way to do it. Forum activity is the only way you can create a player and continue to improve that player. I'm not sure how that's meaningless. RE: Kansas City Appeal - slate - 09-18-2020 (09-18-2020, 01:37 PM)manicmav36 Wrote:(09-18-2020, 11:26 AM)slate Wrote: I get that we still want to keep those people involved but enforcing meaningless forum activity probably isn't the best way to do it. If you are 250 TPE and don't have ISFL aspirations, additional TPE doesn't improve your player at all. RE: Kansas City Appeal - woelkers - 09-18-2020 (09-18-2020, 01:52 PM)slate Wrote:If you are 250 TPE and stop earning, you're no longer developing...and development is the whole point of the DEVELOPMENT Simulation Football League.(09-18-2020, 01:37 PM)manicmav36 Wrote:(09-18-2020, 11:26 AM)slate Wrote: I get that we still want to keep those people involved but enforcing meaningless forum activity probably isn't the best way to do it. RE: Kansas City Appeal - manicmav36 - 09-18-2020 (09-18-2020, 01:52 PM)slate Wrote:(09-18-2020, 01:37 PM)manicmav36 Wrote:(09-18-2020, 11:26 AM)slate Wrote: I get that we still want to keep those people involved but enforcing meaningless forum activity probably isn't the best way to do it. The intention of the DSFL was never to have players stay there indefinitely. The D in DSFL stands for developmental. The whole point of the DSFL is to give low TPE players a place to develop so they can eventually contribute at the ISFL level. RE: Kansas City Appeal - slate - 09-18-2020 (09-18-2020, 01:52 PM)slate Wrote:(09-18-2020, 01:37 PM)manicmav36 Wrote:(09-18-2020, 11:26 AM)slate Wrote: I get that we still want to keep those people involved but enforcing meaningless forum activity probably isn't the best way to do it. It's not the intention and most people won't use it that way but I don't see a problem with some people just wanting to be a DSFL starter for a while. RE: Kansas City Appeal - manicmav36 - 09-18-2020 (09-18-2020, 02:13 PM)slate Wrote:Which is absolutely fine. But that also means that people who intend to use it for the purpose it was created for (development) have precedent over those that don't. And those who don't want to continue to develop should understand that.(09-18-2020, 01:52 PM)slate Wrote:(09-18-2020, 01:37 PM)manicmav36 Wrote:(09-18-2020, 11:26 AM)slate Wrote: I get that we still want to keep those people involved but enforcing meaningless forum activity probably isn't the best way to do it. RE: Kansas City Appeal - slate - 09-18-2020 (09-18-2020, 02:28 PM)manicmav36 Wrote: <snip> Alright yeah that's fair. |