![[DEV] ISFL Forums](http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/images/emerald/logo.png "[DEV] ISFL Forums"){kind=logo}
+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+---- Thread: *Bad Ideas for Spending Money (/showthread.php?tid=26317)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Bad Ideas for Spending Money - Pat - 09-29-2020
(09-29-2020, 09:39 PM)infinitempg Wrote:(09-29-2020, 04:50 PM)Punter715 Wrote:(09-29-2020, 03:52 PM)timeconsumer Wrote: Buy a multi for $50m
Only if your TPE applies to both.
Actually, no, screw it. I'll do double PT and AC's.
Dear Head Office, I'll give you all my money to have a second account.
This was very seriously thrown around back in the day. Only myself and TC (and I think Oles?) had over $50M so we figured "lol no one will ever get this"
Might have to edit this to 100M now
Brb writing more articles for that $100 million
RE: Bad Ideas for Spending Money - Swanty - 09-29-2020
Perhaps a way to incetivise veterans to part with their money is the ability to stave off regression. Each year at the point of regression, users could have the option to pay $10m to push back their regression % to whatever the value is one season earlier. So for example, instead of regressing 20% in their 7th season, a player could pay $10m to avoid it. Then in their 8th season, they could pay another $10 million to regress by 20% instead of 25%.
This would allow very wealthy players to keep their players stronger for longer, and likely push back retirement by a season, but at the cost of $60-70m or so, potentially helping with a HoF push. This would be a low impact way to take a significant amount of money out of the economy from the top earners.
RE: Bad Ideas for Spending Money - LancedJack - 09-30-2020
Not gonna lie I'm furious you didn't include my SOLID GOLD assassination idea