![[DEV] ISFL Forums](http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/images/emerald/logo.png "[DEV] ISFL Forums"){kind=logo}
+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+---- Thread: *Week 1 Power rankings (/showthread.php?tid=2819)
*Week 1 Power rankings - ErMurazor - 08-01-2017
I liked the article, people will always disagree with opinions though. You can't please everyone.
*Week 1 Power rankings - Oles - 08-01-2017
(08-01-2017, 03:24 PM)ErMurazor Wrote:I liked the article, people will always disagree with opinions though. You can't please everyone.
My problem is him basically saying the liberty draft sucked because 1 game has been played for a team full of rookies. I know it's a hot take but I'm sure there's other reasons he could have put the liberty last.
*Week 1 Power rankings - HalfEatenOnionBagel - 08-01-2017
(08-01-2017, 03:13 PM)To12143 Wrote:I didn't know 1 game meant a busted draft.
Seriously, rookies are expected to come in behind the rest of the league. You need at least a couple seasons before calling the draft a bust. I understand last place in some week 1 power rankings being an expansion team of course but blaming the draft is ridiculous. I find it hard to believe someone could have drafted a team that would have been much better at this point
*Week 1 Power rankings - ErMurazor - 08-01-2017
(08-01-2017, 01:26 PM)To12143 Wrote:My problem is him basically saying the liberty draft sucked because 1 game has been played for a team full of rookies. I know it's a hot take but I'm sure there's other reasons he could have put the liberty last.
I mean, I don't think you have to take what he's saying as gospel.
He also didn't say the words bust or suck anywhere in his analysis, you guys are just being really sensitive. He said the defense just wasn't up to snuff. Considering a team that averaged 15.2 ppg scored 31 on you guys, I don't think it's a terrible thing to say.
*Week 1 Power rankings - HalfEatenOnionBagel - 08-01-2017
(08-01-2017, 03:20 PM)Noppadet Wrote:Baltimore got 6 sacks not 4. 3 TFLs as well. Your whole pressure argument is pretty misplaced actually with the Hawks.
Yeah hawks have a very good front 7 in my opinion, these rankings are accurate but most of the explanations seem like an overreaction
*Week 1 Power rankings - tlk742 - 08-01-2017
(08-01-2017, 03:23 PM)Gwdaja Wrote:Damn, so even moreso to what I'm saying. 6 sacks is a really good pass rush game.
You guys are right, I have revised my statement. I gotta work on counting
@Noppadet
*Week 1 Power rankings - ErMurazor - 08-01-2017
(08-01-2017, 01:33 PM)tlk742 Wrote:You guys are right, I have revised my statement. I gotta work on counting
@Noppadet
You suck. This sucks. Die!
)
*Week 1 Power rankings - adam2552 - 08-01-2017
I agree that we should be 8th. We haven't won anything yet. But disagree that "the defense is not present." You failed to mention our league leading 6 TFLs. If you add every teams sacks/TFLs, we'd be ahead of Otters, Legion and Yeti.
*Week 1 Power rankings - Oles - 08-01-2017
(08-01-2017, 03:31 PM)ErMurazor Wrote:I mean, I don't think you have to take what he's saying as gospel.
He also didn't say the words bust or suck anywhere in his analysis, you guys are just being really sensitive. He said the defense just wasn't up to snuff. Considering a team that averaged 15.2 ppg scored 31 on you guys, I don't think it's a terrible thing to say.
Quote:Speaking of drafts, remember when everyone said the liberty won the draft? It didn't seem like it last night.
This line stated makes it seem like he expected a bunch of rookies to be automatically up to par with the rest of the league, not taking it as gospel, just providing input and how I understood his statement. I don't think we're being sensitive at all, just responding.
*Week 1 Power rankings - Noppadet - 08-01-2017
(08-01-2017, 01:33 PM)tlk742 Wrote:You guys are right, I have revised my statement. I gotta work on counting
@Noppadet
:cheers: