![]() |
*S2 Re-Draft - Printable Version +- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums) +-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38) +---- Thread: *S2 Re-Draft (/showthread.php?tid=3455) |
*S2 Re-Draft - kckolbe - 08-18-2017 (08-18-2017, 07:44 AM)To12143 Wrote:Guess i should have waited to get my equipment until after the draft. Amazing that you were able to buy all your S1 gear and still get S2 predraft. You were beasting it. Also, I disagree with how this was done. Predraft TPE should have been factored. Lavelle is still the best CB, after all, and likely still will be in 2 more years once all the contracts end. *S2 Re-Draft - JR95 - 08-18-2017 (08-18-2017, 10:01 AM)kckolbe Wrote:Amazing that you were able to buy all your S1 gear and still get S2 predraft. You were beasting it. Also, I disagree with how this was done. Predraft TPE should have been factored. Lavelle is still the best CB, after all, and likely still will be in 2 more years once all the contracts end.If you read it you would know this isnt even about the best players. Its literally just a look at who has gained the most tpe. *S2 Re-Draft - JR95 - 08-18-2017 (08-18-2017, 06:17 AM)tlk742 Wrote:Hey I don't want to be the guy to tell you your numbers are off for some players, but your numbers are off for me. Pick 53. Quote:To do this I will be taking each player’s total TPE at the time of the draft (anything in update threads claimed BEFORE July 19th) and comparing it to their current TPE (also taken from update pages) Those 70 TPE were in an update posted before the 19th however not all the claims in that update were posted before the 19th. Those are not included because they were not earned prior to the draft. *S2 Re-Draft - kckolbe - 08-18-2017 (08-18-2017, 08:38 AM)JR95 Wrote:If you read it you would know this isnt even about the best players. Its literally just a look at who has gained the most tpe. I understand that. But a player who was drafted with 0 TPE and gains 100 is still worth less than a player drafted with 50 TPE who gains 90. *S2 Re-Draft - JR95 - 08-18-2017 (08-18-2017, 10:44 AM)kckolbe Wrote:I understand that. But a player who was drafted with 0 TPE and gains 100 is still worth less than a player drafted with 50 TPE who gains 90.You are still completely missing the point. At no point did I ever say a player drafted with 0 tpe and gains 100 is worth more than a player with 50 who gains 90. All I said is that it is ranked based on who earned the most tpe. *S2 Re-Draft - tlk742 - 08-18-2017 (08-18-2017, 10:45 AM)JR95 Wrote:You are still completely missing the point. At no point did I ever say a player drafted with 0 tpe and gains 100 is worth more than a player with 50 who gains 90. All I said is that it is ranked based on who earned the most tpe.Yeah, and you have my gains off by about 70... your numbers are off Code: 53. Darren Smallwood - WR - TPE at draft: 63 - Current TPE: 129 - TPE earned: 66 *S2 Re-Draft - kckolbe - 08-18-2017 (08-18-2017, 08:45 AM)JR95 Wrote:You are still completely missing the point. At no point did I ever say a player drafted with 0 tpe and gains 100 is worth more than a player with 50 who gains 90. All I said is that it is ranked based on who earned the most tpe. Re-draft does mean that, though. You didn't call it "ranking TPE gain by rookies," you called it a re-draft, which very much suggests you value those players more. *S2 Re-Draft - JR95 - 08-18-2017 (08-18-2017, 10:53 AM)tlk742 Wrote:Yeah, and you have my gains off by about 70...You're right with your's i missed some. Fuck me for trying to do a fun article right? ![]() *S2 Re-Draft - JR95 - 08-18-2017 (08-18-2017, 10:56 AM)kckolbe Wrote:Re-draft does mean that, though. You didn't call it "ranking TPE gain by rookies," you called it a re-draft, which very much suggests you value those players more.Can you not read the subtitle?? or did you reply to argue with me some more before taking the time to check? *S2 Re-Draft - tlk742 - 08-18-2017 (08-18-2017, 10:58 AM)JR95 Wrote:You're right with your's i missed some. Fuck me for trying to do a fun article right?all good ![]() I just looked at that, and I'm like I know I've been keeping pace with chess and I know 66 is too low ![]() |