*Week 10/11 Power Rankings - Printable Version

*Week 10/11 Power Rankings - Printable Version

+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+---- Thread: *Week 10/11 Power Rankings (/showthread.php?tid=3490)

Pages: 1 2 3

*Week 10/11 Power Rankings - Valtookan - 08-18-2017

(08-18-2017, 03:48 PM)manicmav36 Wrote:I get that we lost a good player, but he's only 1 player. We still have one of the better defenses in the league.

One of the better? Who does your defense have?

*Week 10/11 Power Rankings - SimmerDownBruhh - 08-18-2017

*takes out salt shaker, sprinkles salt throughout this thread*

*Week 10/11 Power Rankings - Roshambo - 08-18-2017

(08-18-2017, 02:06 PM)tlk742 Wrote:They just have to hope that they can stay hot like the takes of this power ranker

I like that.

OCO

*Week 10/11 Power Rankings - Perry87 - 08-18-2017

(08-18-2017, 04:51 PM)Valtookan Wrote:One of the better? Who does your defense have?

They're the best at generating turnovers per snap. Doesn't matter who they have if they perform

*Week 10/11 Power Rankings - manicmav36 - 08-18-2017

(08-18-2017, 03:51 PM)Valtookan Wrote:One of the better? Who does your defense have?

We've played the top 2 offenses twice, yet are still 4th in points allowed, 3rd in yards allowed, 2nd in rushing yards allowed, and 3rd in passing yards allowed. Not too shabby for a team ranked 6th here.

*Week 10/11 Power Rankings - 124715 - 08-18-2017

(08-18-2017, 04:52 PM)SimmerDownBruhh Wrote:*takes out salt shaker, sprinkles salt throughout this thread*

Now that's just redundant.

*Week 10/11 Power Rankings - Valtookan - 08-18-2017

(08-18-2017, 03:55 PM)Perry87 Wrote:They're the best at generating turnovers per snap. Doesn't matter who they have if they perform

I see... well Mr. Tucker, when you force more than 3 turnovers in 10 games (That's .3 Turnovers Per Game) you can come tell me about that too.

Also, the Outlaws have forced more Turnovers this season... in LESS GAMES so I believe your statistic is a bit outdated. Plus, how the hell have the BAL

forced 5 fumbles but recovered 8 as a team?

*Week 10/11 Power Rankings - sabills - 08-18-2017

(08-18-2017, 03:46 PM)Valtookan Wrote:If I could upvote this, I would.

+1

My Respect to you.

*Week 10/11 Power Rankings - Perry87 - 08-18-2017

(08-18-2017, 05:22 PM)Valtookan Wrote:I see... well Mr. Tucker, when you force more than 3 turnovers in 10 games (That's .3 Turnovers Per Game) you can come tell me about that too.

Also, the Outlaws have forced more Turnovers this season... in LESS GAMES so I believe your statistic is a bit outdated. Plus, how the hell have the forced 5 fumbles but recovered 8 as a team?

Im sorry, how many turnovers do I need to be able to comment? Are we playing the game where you cant talk about which team is good if you're not on a good team? Fuck off...

I did a article a week ago that showed that Baltimore was generating turnovers every 30.3 snaps, whereas Arizona every 34.3. Granted its probably changed since the beatdown of SJ, but that doesnt change the fact that they're one of the best teams at creating turnovers. Its so obvious someone with 3 turnovers can see it, why cant you?

*Week 10/11 Power Rankings - 124715 - 08-18-2017

Otters are 6-5, Hawks are 7-4, and cats are 3-8. Great article!

Takes getting hotter and hotter, gtfo or you'll get burned