(08-31-2017, 12:18 PM)Noble Wrote:That typo had nothing to do with the Hawks buddy, that was on my updating crew and I take full responsibility. Work is being done to make sure nothing like that happens again, but it's not Baltimore's fault so. Them being the NSFC champions is the truth, and we saw through re-sim tests that Gibson didn't make a significant difference.

(08-31-2017, 09:18 AM)Noble Wrote:That typo had nothing to do with the Hawks buddy, that was on my updating crew and I take full responsibility. Work is being done to make sure nothing like that happens again, but it's not Baltimore's fault so. Them being the NSFC champions is the truth, and we saw through re-sim tests that Gibson didn't make a significant difference.

(08-31-2017, 11:08 AM)Archon Wrote:tl;dr - Hawks post thread to get prospects that includes they are NSFC Champions. I reply saying they had a player with +275 TPE (the amount of TPE required to go from 75 to 100). Hendrix deletes my post which I personally consider to be abuse of power considering he is the Hawks GM. This thread is created.

(08-31-2017, 10:19 AM)iamslm22 Wrote:I'm trying to limit my involvement, but it's not just any updater, it was the GM of the team we beat. This Archon dude is salty as hell and has been trolling since day 1.

(08-31-2017, 09:23 AM)Noble Wrote:And he was picked up by the Legion :lol: So not like the playoffs meant anything to him at all, won't be close to the Top half for a good time yet.

(08-31-2017, 10:18 AM)Noble Wrote:That typo had nothing to do with the Hawks buddy, that was on my updating crew and I take full responsibility. Work is being done to make sure nothing like that happens again, but it's not Baltimore's fault so. Them being the NSFC champions is the truth, and we saw through re-sim tests that Gibson didn't make a significant difference.

(08-31-2017, 12:21 PM)evryday Wrote:Tbf, we did absolutely nothing wrong when it comes to the agility thing. My update thread was correct. The opposing GM, as in NOT our GM, updated my player incorrectly. So can you please explain how we cheated? Oh wait, we didn't. Give it a rest, dude. You look childish and you're not helping the league no matter how much you think you might be by "exposing cheaters"

(08-31-2017, 09:24 AM)kckolbe Wrote:Also, a GM ruling on the deletion of negative remarks made against his own team is a SIGNIFICANT conflict of interest.  I do not want to see this again.

(08-31-2017, 11:24 AM)kckolbe Wrote:A difference doesn't need to be significant to be a difference.  I do not believe the Hawks are in any at fault from Broadway's boost, but a single missed tackle could have had made a difference.  Look at Cushing's performance in the first half when the offense couldn't get a first down: 114 yards allowed.  In the second half when the offense moved?  0 yards allowed.  Small differences can have huge effects.