[DEV] ISFL Forums
Buff Run Support SS and CB - Printable Version

+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Discussion (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+---- Forum: Suggestion Box (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=34)
+----- Forum: Archived Suggestions (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=349)
+----- Thread: Buff Run Support SS and CB (/showthread.php?tid=4010)

Pages: 1 2


Buff Run Support SS and CB - kcheng686 - 09-01-2017

(09-01-2017, 06:42 PM)Ballerstorm Wrote:I'm camping so I can't give a full reply, but the problem with the proposed "best starting" archetype for CB but it ends up being the worst is that people would just choose it to start ahead and then at the end of their third season just use their archetype swap to change to another one

The thing is that no one picks it anyway already. Its the worst starting and ending CB class.

I think theres maybe 1 total Run Supp CB in the league, to how many Man2Man one?

Plus maybe people will enjoy running it

And we could always nerf its starting or buff its end so its Max TPE isnt as bad as it is now


Buff Run Support SS and CB - Sweetwater - 09-01-2017

(09-01-2017, 09:36 PM)Bzerkap Wrote:In the modern NFL there really aren't SS and FS. Safeties should be interchangeable to not give away defensive tendencies

I agree they should be, but everyone knows the ET3 is the free safety and Kam Chancellor is the SS, just like everyone knows Eric Berry is a free safety. But yes, they should be similar and their playstyle dictating their usage. On the whole though, FS us usually a roaming support/last line of defense in the secondary, while the SS will often be more man coverage if needed/run support/roaming coverage LB.