![[DEV] ISFL Forums](http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/images/emerald/logo.png "[DEV] ISFL Forums"){kind=logo}
+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+---- Thread: *The Las Vegas Big Gamble (/showthread.php?tid=5177)
*The Las Vegas Big Gamble - ItsJustBarry - 10-13-2017
FFS. Even when this team wins, it loses.
*The Las Vegas Big Gamble - adam2552 - 10-13-2017
(10-13-2017, 02:07 PM)7hawk77 Wrote:This is being investigated by the HO.
However, I will point out that your initial point being 1 million over before stormblessed was traded is false.
They do not have Guard - Long for 500k or DT - Newenglander for 500k.
This means the total salary is 59 million. With cap penalties that brings it up to 61 million. Since they paid for the swap out of cap, it is at 65 mil which is fine instead of the alleged 66 mil which you've shown.
Still looking in to the other stuff.
I couldn't find anything regarding their S3 contracts, but both of them are on the Legion's roster in the index. Newenglander got $500k in S2, so I assumed it was the same for S3.
*The Las Vegas Big Gamble - 7hawk77 - 10-13-2017
(10-13-2017, 12:19 PM)adam2552 Wrote:I couldn't find anything regarding their S3 contracts, but both of them are on the Legion's roster in the index. Newenglander got $500k in S2, so I assumed it was the same for S3.
Yeah, we're going to continue to look in to it. Could be they weren't supposed to be on the index and it wasn't a budgeting mess up. Not really sure yet.
From my initial findings I believe they are still over the cap by 2 million when everything is said and done. I'm waiting on others for feedback though.
*The Las Vegas Big Gamble - TheMemeMaestro - 10-13-2017
(10-13-2017, 10:08 AM)PDXBaller Wrote:The Cushing Bowl!
I am serious about these Resims @ErMurazor
Edit: I see it has been resolved elsewhere
*The Las Vegas Big Gamble - ErMurazor - 10-13-2017
Some teams played over the cap in season 1/season 2 and their penalty was to simply cut players to get under the cap.
*The Las Vegas Big Gamble - Zoone16 - 10-13-2017
SMFH
Give us a fucking break... I had to watch us get butt fucked by every team for 2 seasons already...
*The Las Vegas Big Gamble - sapp2013 - 10-13-2017
If I read the rules correctly, if tanner is over $4mil, the dsfl team pays for $4 mil and the nsfl team pays for the rest. I did not look at anything besides this article, but would the ending total drop by $2 mil then, or was the $2 mil not accounted for earlier? I.e. tanners 2 mil should be paid already and only 4 mil extra should be paid after the bring up.
*The Las Vegas Big Gamble - adam2552 - 10-13-2017
(10-13-2017, 03:27 PM)sapp2013 Wrote:If I read the rules correctly, if tanner is over $4mil, the dsfl team pays for $4 mil and the nsfl team pays for the rest. I did not look at anything besides this article, but would the ending total drop by $2 mil then, or was the $2 mil not accounted for earlier? I.e. tanners 2 mil should be paid already and only 4 mil extra should be paid after the bring up.
I did not account for this. So if true, then even with not counting Newenglander and Long, they were $2mil over week 1, and then $4mil over after calling Baker/Tanner up.
*The Las Vegas Big Gamble - Ben - 10-13-2017
@adam2552 had you looked at the budget in the transactions area? http://nsfl.jcink.net/index.php?showtopic=4436
I was very careful in making sure we were under the cap with all things considered and we even made it under after there was a rule change in the amount DSFL absorbs AFTER we finalised Tanners contract which was a bit annoying.
You're right though, when Tanner was pulled up I forgot about the change in salaries that would make and failed to reflect that on this page. Just another problem with the whole DSFL system and introduction which was not fun for our team who just doesn't have the depth to be dropping down active players.
Since we were playing over the cap after calling Tanner up we can retroactively reduce contracts (with the consent of the player of course) to get under the cap, would that be fair to you? And @Ballerstorm?
*The Las Vegas Big Gamble - adam2552 - 10-13-2017
Honestly, I just made this an article for the money and for Cushing to possibly get a way out if he wanted to. The content inside is true though. In the Discord, I said I don't even think LV should be penalized. I stand by that.