![[DEV] ISFL Forums](http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/images/emerald/logo.png "[DEV] ISFL Forums"){kind=logo}
+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+---- Thread: *Analyzing activity across positions (/showthread.php?tid=5362)
*Analyzing activity across positions - iamslm22 - 10-19-2017
(10-19-2017, 11:20 AM)tlk742 Wrote:SHOES ON THE OTHER FOOT NOW!
but if that's the case it is 41%
Buit here's the question, can we break it down by DE and DT?
Here's the real question to active linemen, if you could switch to a different position at no penalty, would you?
100000000% BUT only if it didn't hurt the Hawks. I don't wanna screw the guys over by switching, but would definitely rather not be an o Lineman.
*Analyzing activity across positions - HalfEatenOnionBagel - 10-19-2017
(10-19-2017, 11:22 AM)iamslm22 Wrote:100000000% BUT only if it didn't hurt the Hawks. I don't wanna screw the guys over by switching, but would definitely rather not be an o Lineman.
Same, I play OL because it's a need but if I knew that there was something in place so that switching wouldn't hurt my team or give another team more of an advantage I would.
*Analyzing activity across positions - sapp2013 - 10-19-2017
(10-19-2017, 10:20 AM)tlk742 Wrote:SHOES ON THE OTHER FOOT NOW!Ha. And 40.625%. I consider it close enough and only differs because numbers don't line up perfectly.
but if that's the case it is 41%
Buit here's the question, can we break it down by DE and DT?
Here's the real question to active linemen, if you could switch to a different position at no penalty, would you?
We have to think how many OL will switch to DT and DT switch to OL.
*Analyzing activity across positions - tlk742 - 10-19-2017
So if no one is having fun being an O-lineman, why keep it? We should have fun with this.
*Analyzing activity across positions - Bzerkap - 10-19-2017
Yea I would switch and like it was said earlier you can’t simply look at raw numbers. You have to look at the type of people who play these positions.
*Analyzing activity across positions - sapp2013 - 10-19-2017
(10-19-2017, 10:25 AM)tlk742 Wrote:So if no one is having fun being an O-lineman, why keep it? We should have fun with this.
I think the argument is maybe o line is not the only position and we are singling it out without checking the numbers.
*Analyzing activity across positions - iamslm22 - 10-19-2017
(10-19-2017, 11:33 AM)sapp2013 Wrote:I think the argument is maybe o line is not the only position and we are singling it out without checking the numbers.
Every other position is more enjoyable AND doesn't have a crisis. People are creating other positions. Clearly O Line is the least desirable position, and the best ones want to switch.
*Analyzing activity across positions - sapp2013 - 10-19-2017
(10-19-2017, 10:34 AM)iamslm22 Wrote:Every other position is more enjoyable AND doesn't have a crisis. People are creating other positions. Clearly O Line is the least desirable position, and the best ones want to switch.
According to earlier, DL are just as inactive at 40%. I don't know how people feel about the positions since I don't play them, so I am not touching that aspext. I agree we should remove o line, but for thoroughness, we need to exercise all arguments.
*Analyzing activity across positions - ErMurazor - 10-19-2017
If somebody suggests we replace DL with bots I riot.
*Analyzing activity across positions - tlk742 - 10-19-2017
(10-19-2017, 11:55 AM)ErMurazor Wrote:If somebody suggests we replace DL with bots I riot.Well right because there's some glory to being a D-lineman, not so much with O-line, people did it out of need rather than desire.