![[DEV] ISFL Forums](http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/images/emerald/logo.png "[DEV] ISFL Forums"){kind=logo}
+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Announcements (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=495)
+--- Forum: Announcements (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Forum: Head Office Announcements (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=230)
+---- Thread: NSFL Rule Vote Results (/showthread.php?tid=6524)
NSFL Rule Vote Results - loco - 12-17-2017
(12-16-2017, 11:10 AM)bovovovo Wrote:Agreed 100%ya but trying to keep rules because they're good for you and not for the league is the definition of dumb in a league that is struggling like this one *cough* @kckolbe *cough*
Only thing I can think of is for some GMs it’s not a problem waiting until the last minute each night so they want to keep that advantage over others
NSFL Rule Vote Results - sapp2013 - 12-17-2017
Quote:The RFA tag stands as it is, but can only be applied to a player that was drafted by your team and at the conclusion of their rookie contract. If the player signs an extension as a rookie, then the RFA tag does not apply. (8/13)
im surprised this did not go through. The original RFA tag rules still apply, but this just puts more restrictions on it. I know most of us (players) hate the RFA tag rule and some of us want it gone all together, so wouldnt this be a step in the right direction?
NSFL Rule Vote Results - iamslm22 - 12-17-2017
(12-17-2017, 01:18 AM)loco Wrote:ya but trying to keep rules because they're good for you and not for the league is the definition of dumb in a league that is struggling like this one *cough* @kckolbe *cough*
He did change his vote on that topic
NSFL Rule Vote Results - AdamS - 12-17-2017
I won't out who voted to keep dc's visible (because I'm not a dick) but I am absolutely surprised we missed passing that rule. By ONE voted, too.
I think the league will absolutely 100% improve when we don't know what one another are doing. I can only assume that maybe someone was unsure of what was being voted on.
NSFL Rule Vote Results - timeconsumer - 12-17-2017
(12-17-2017, 05:14 AM)AdamS Wrote:I won't out who voted to keep dc's visible (because I'm not a dick) but I am absolutely surprised we missed passing that rule. By ONE voted, too.
I think the league will absolutely 100% improve when we don't know what one another are doing. I can only assume that maybe someone was unsure of what was being voted on.
I blame Dermot.
NSFL Rule Vote Results - Bzerkap - 12-17-2017
(12-17-2017, 02:14 AM)AdamS Wrote:I won't out who voted to keep dc's visible (because I'm not a dick) but I am absolutely surprised we missed passing that rule. By ONE voted, too.It was pretty annoying to see. I’m really surprised as well. Tim to bring it up next season as well I guess....
I think the league will absolutely 100% improve when we don't know what one another are doing. I can only assume that maybe someone was unsure of what was being voted on.
NSFL Rule Vote Results - Symmetrik - 12-17-2017
I can understand why the invisible DCs rule was not passed, as there are obviously going to be some people, most likely HO and definitely the simmer, who could take a glance at the strategies and inform their team of their opponents strats. Which gives a couple teams a big advantage, whereas at least this way every team has an equal opportunity to look at strats.
NSFL Rule Vote Results - AdamS - 12-17-2017
If we can't trust HO or the simmer, they shouldn't be on those roles
NSFL Rule Vote Results - DeathOnReddit - 12-17-2017
Im surprised so many dont agree with HO getting more money.
NSFL Rule Vote Results - Symmetrik - 12-17-2017
(12-17-2017, 06:44 PM)AdamS Wrote:If we can't trust HO or the simmer, they shouldn't be on those roles
after Er just tainted the entire history of the league you really think that's a good card to play right now?