[DEV] ISFL Forums
*Saints Row - Printable Version

+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+---- Thread: *Saints Row (/showthread.php?tid=7802)

Pages: 1 2 3


*Saints Row - Oles - 03-05-2018

(03-05-2018, 06:53 AM)TheMemeMaestro Wrote:Ok, so just to be clear, I have established that Regression starts AFTER S7 right? You didn't address the part where I showed the exact wording after you started talking about how it wasn't clear enough with wording. But as for QB, just wait and see.

I figured it wasn't worth addressing, you proved it, if you need me to validate that you showed that I was incorrect because I did not realize the wording was horrible (it should not be labeled 7th season, as regression does not start for that season). Saying wait and see basically confirms that you're switching Tweed, which is going to be hilarious considering that all I saw was backlash from Yeti players who thought it meant the end of drafting QBs, seems a bit hypocritical for those players to now accept it since they're benefiting from it.


*Saints Row - TheMemeMaestro - 03-05-2018

(03-05-2018, 03:57 AM)To12143 Wrote:I figured it wasn't worth addressing, you proved it, if you need me to validate that you showed that I was incorrect because I did not realize the wording was horrible (it should not be labeled 7th season, as regression does not start for that season).  Saying wait and see basically confirms that you're switching Tweed, which is going to be hilarious considering that all I saw was backlash from Yeti players who thought it meant the end of drafting QBs, seems a bit hypocritical for those players to now accept it since they're benefiting from it.

I'm not saying we are switching Tweed, but if we do, its only because everyone else did.


*Saints Row - jparks98 - 03-05-2018

[Image: tenor.gif]


*Saints Row - tbone415 - 03-05-2018

Linebacker core looking real strong leading a winless team.


*Saints Row - timeconsumer - 03-05-2018

(03-05-2018, 05:05 AM)AdamS Wrote:they're the best group of actual LBs in the league by my scouting

What does that mean?


*Saints Row - HENDRIX - 03-05-2018

Yeah, this is ambiguous:

Code:
"CODE
7th season 20% TPE loss
8th season 25% TPE loss
9th season 30% TPE loss
10th season 40% TPE loss
11th season 50% TPE loss
12th season 75% TPE loss
13th season 75% TPE loss
14th season 75% TPE loss
15th season 75% TPE loss (final season)"

Should write "After" before the season number.


*Saints Row - 124715 - 03-05-2018

(03-05-2018, 02:08 PM)timeconsumer Wrote:What does that mean?

Woah there no need to get defensive

/s



*Saints Row - timeconsumer - 03-05-2018

(03-05-2018, 02:42 PM)124715 Wrote:Woah there no need to get defensive

/s

Sarcasm aside I could see how my question could be construed that way. But I legitimately am wondering what makes a LB corps an "actual" or "not actual" in @AdamS mind


*Saints Row - AdamS - 03-05-2018

It means I'm not counting the safeties some of us use as part time lbs.


*Saints Row - timeconsumer - 03-05-2018

(03-05-2018, 10:21 PM)AdamS Wrote:It means I'm not counting the safeties some of us use as part time lbs.

It gets kind of confusing though. Otters play full time Nickel but start a LB at nickel corner. Wraiths play full time Nickel but are starting a safety at nickel corner. Would we both be counted as an "actual" LB corps here? Or just Otters even though they have a LB as a DB? What about teams who play a full time 3-3-5 like NOLA?

This might read as snarky but I am legitimately wondering, seems hard to draw a definite line in a lot of this.