![[DEV] ISFL Forums](http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/images/emerald/logo.png "[DEV] ISFL Forums"){kind=logo}
+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Discussion (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+---- Forum: Suggestion Box (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=34)
+----- Forum: Archived Suggestions (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=349)
+----- Thread: Proposal to HO Punishment Process (/showthread.php?tid=11339)
Proposal to HO Punishment Process - kckolbe - 12-13-2018
(12-13-2018, 08:00 PM)Renrut Wrote:I bet you’re fun at parties.
Eh, I'm actually pretty quiet in large group events. Big surprise, the guy always at home on the computer isn't much for the social scene. I am a lot more playful in person, though.
Proposal to HO Punishment Process - ADwyer87 - 12-14-2018
(12-13-2018, 09:03 PM)kckolbe Wrote:Bear in mind that HO outnumbers the appeals board and that neither entity is likely to be unanimous in their initial finding. I can't say you don't make a fair point, but it is also unlikely HO will vote against their own proposal, either. Bias affects everyone, after all.I mean.
I get your argument here.
but.
thats exactly what we just did with this appeal...
Proposal to HO Punishment Process - iamslm22 - 12-14-2018
(12-14-2018, 07:43 AM)ADwyer87 Wrote:I mean.
I get your argument here.
but.
thats exactly what we just did with this appeal...
Right. I feel like this argument would have worked better if you guys ignored our appeal......
But you didn't. The process worked the first (and so far only) time it's been used.
Proposal to HO Punishment Process - kckolbe - 12-14-2018
(12-14-2018, 08:03 AM)iamslm22 Wrote:Right. I feel like this argument would have worked better if you guys ignored our appeal......
But you didn't. The process worked the first (and so far only) time it's been used.
This is a positive sign, and I can't deny that. However, as a proof of concept, it is lacking in the sense that the appeal decision was made with information not known/considered in the original decision. It is possible that had it been available then, the original decision would have been what the appeals team proposed.