![[DEV] ISFL Forums](http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/images/emerald/logo.png "[DEV] ISFL Forums"){kind=logo}
+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Announcements (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=495)
+--- Forum: Announcements (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Forum: Head Office Announcements (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=230)
+---- Thread: Week 1 Decision (/showthread.php?tid=15265)
Week 1 Decision - JuOSu - 08-29-2019
(08-29-2019, 06:15 AM)JKortesi81 Wrote:Clearly we need a third proper game then.
That’s the whole point behind why I said we should restart the season with everyone being correct.
But heaven forbid we have a fair season. Somehow doing things the right way gets overshadowed by “OMG MY FORCED FUMBLES THOUGH” and “MY YARDS OMG WTF”.
That’s backwards.
That's not what you said above though, above you said you won the second game fair and everything was fine and dandy.
I would have been fine with a third game too, as I have said in discord. But to act like the second game was somehow the fair one is silly
Week 1 Decision - Rise of Smitty - 08-29-2019
re-sim the reverted re-sim. or I leave.
Week 1 Decision - 37thchamber - 08-29-2019
(08-29-2019, 10:37 AM)AdamS Wrote:GMs should be given read access to the player file.Out of curiosity, why isn't this visible to everyone?
Week 1 Decision - GoonerBear - 08-29-2019
Having caused a previous crisis in the past while with them, I know how easy it is for a few mistakes in the updaters' files to propagate into a huge mess. They have a tough job that has to stay consistent with little room for error. I'm glad they have owned their mistake and are taking steps to correct what else there is.
On the no re-sim decision, I would still save that for the worst of the worst discrepancies and also bear in mind the leverage of the week it affects. Something where it would be more likely to use it late in the season or in the postseason than in the early weeks, though still require a lot to be wrong before the discussion can begin.
Week 1 Decision - Sweetwater - 08-29-2019
(08-29-2019, 09:39 AM)37thchamber Wrote:Out of curiosity, why isn't this visible to everyone?
2 reasons
First, nobody would use it.
This is proven by the second, which is that you already basically have it.
In the index, a teams roster page will show almost everything the update page shows, except for the p layer I'd and experience
Week 1 Decision - Unicorn - 08-29-2019
not resimming for any reason in the future is dumb imo
Week 1 Decision - 37thchamber - 08-29-2019
(08-29-2019, 03:49 PM)Sweetwater Wrote:In the index, a teams roster page will show almost everything the update page shows, except for the p layer I'd and experienceThen why would it matter if GMs were given read access?
Week 1 Decision - adam2552 - 08-29-2019
We should just have players update their own players and have a team that does "randomly screened drug test" audits on X amount of players per week. Add in a player suspension component for over spending TPE.
Week 1 Decision - JKortesi81 - 08-29-2019
(08-29-2019, 09:33 AM)JuOSu Wrote:That's not what you said above though, above you said you won the second game fair and everything was fine and dandy.
I would have been fine with a third game too, as I have said in discord. But to act like the second game was somehow the fair one is silly
Honestly, i thought the second simmed game had both of our rosters correctly updated. I missed the part where it was still wrong, my mistake.
Week 1 Decision - Sweetwater - 08-29-2019
(08-29-2019, 10:05 AM)37thchamber Wrote:Then why would it matter if GMs were given read access?
They claim they want to check in the less than 24 hours between updates being finalized and simming beginning. As you may have noticed, this didnt happen in the 40 hours this offseason, so your guess is as good as mine.
But keep in mind, I dont care either way lol.