(02-10-2021, 06:42 PM)deadlunatic Wrote:

(02-10-2021, 06:27 PM)Oles Wrote:

(02-10-2021, 05:31 PM)deadlunatic Wrote:

(02-10-2021, 04:56 PM)Oles Wrote:

(02-10-2021, 04:33 PM)DatSmolBoi Wrote: Yeah this is too long to read where is the tdlr

TLDR is they spent 800 hours, made a shit load of spreadsheets, and still didn't test enough to actually fix issues but instead focused on making sure WRs wouldn't get 2k yards. Meanwhile we see egregious issues like DPI,  penalties and all that are just now being fixed even though the sim team spent a lot of time in it.

 
@Oles
Somebody seems butthurt about something. Cut them some slack, I didn't hear about you doing anything to help? Other than complaining in a thread where they are trying to let us know they are still actively working on fixing issues....

You're right, I didn't help because I didn't have the time to help, the sim to help, nor the desire at this point. I've done plenty to help the league in the past, things like being the only person running the DSFL, simming it, streaming it, having full control over it during the worst recruiting periods of the league (in which I had 0 control over despite being the person running their first introduction to the league). I've spent over a year of my life working diligently to help the sim league, even during the worst times of the league. You're damn right I'm gonna be upset when I see constant issues with the sim that could have been worked through before the switch. The issues that have arisen would have been seen in testing, especially if they had watched any of the games like they are presented to us. I didn't see you doing anything to help either so by what you've said you have no room to call anyone out on the matter

I'm sorry, I should have clarified, you didn't seem to have helped with migrating to the new sim. Nor did I see where you brought anything useful to the conversation other than complaining and belittling what they spent a lot of time doing for free, for the rest of us. I didn't mean to imply you have never done anything for the sim nor that you don't have a right to complain. The problem is where you are complaining, at least that is my issue. 
Not sure me having not helped means I now lose my right to call someone out for coming across as a thankless jerk. I just think if you want to heard on a serious note, this was exactly the wrong way to not come across like a dick. This is just my opinion. you are free to handle your business however you like.

(02-10-2021, 06:53 PM)Oles Wrote: I want the best product for the league, and so far the transfer team has not shown me that the transfer was worth it in complete honesty.

(02-10-2021, 06:58 PM)infinitempg Wrote:

(02-10-2021, 06:53 PM)Oles Wrote: I want the best product for the league, and so far the transfer team has not shown me that the transfer was worth it in complete honesty.

Everything else aside, the way the league accessed DDSPF16 was less than legal. Moving on to 21 is somewhat of a liability issue

(02-10-2021, 06:42 PM)excelsior Wrote: Some people will find a way to get mad at anything

(02-10-2021, 06:35 PM)Memento Mori Wrote: We're seeing far more fumbles than in the previous sim (and compared with the NFL), is this intended? Any plans to adjust competitiveness or another attribute involved with causing fumbles/retaining possession of the ball?

(02-10-2021, 06:35 PM)Memento Mori Wrote: Thanks for doing this. Appreciate you addressing running backs and receivers, but there's a few other notable issues so far IMO.

Is a fix for mobile/scrambler QBs being worked on? At the moment they're really bad and so all fourteen ISFL QBs are using one of the same three archetypes (there's actually less diversity than in DDSPF16 at the moment).

We're seeing far more fumbles than in the previous sim (and compared with the NFL), is this intended? Any plans to adjust competitiveness or another attribute involved with causing fumbles/retaining possession of the ball?

As others have mentioned, some positions (most notably safety) seem to be performing below par individually/statistically compared with other position groups, are there any plans to address safety/other maligned positions?

(02-10-2021, 06:35 PM)Memento Mori Wrote: As others have mentioned, some positions (most notably safety) seem to be performing below par individually/statistically compared with other position groups, are there any plans to address safety/other maligned positions?

(02-10-2021, 08:43 PM)Punter715 Wrote: Fumble numbers:
As of now, we don't have any plans on adjusting Competitiveness nor Hands for QB (sorry @Z-Whiz I was posting this before I saw your question!) It might sound like a non-answer but we're keeping an eye on it. Fumbles are definitely much higher than they were previously, but for comparison's sake:

S26 fumble rate - 0.85 forced fumbles/game
S27 fumble rate (through 6 weeks) - 1.93 forced fumbles/game
NFL 2019 Season FF Rate - 1.73 fumbles/game

I'm not trying to prove a point, I just wanted to put out that while we are on pace for much, much higher fumble numbers, they are not egregiously more than we see in the NFL, which was our benchmark throughout development.