(09-15-2017, 06:29 PM)kckolbe Wrote:Man, you nailed it right here:

"We can’t penalize the Yeti for something that they had no idea was going on, and had no control over. I’m torn because while I don’t want the Yeti to just get completely screwed over, I also don’t want a cancer like that in the league."

This is where I am torn.  Their GMs are BRAND NEW.  We know they weren't complicit or even aware.  Basically, I think the punishment was too soft on Noble, but too harsh on the team.

I think I would have let him play, BUT I think the penalty should be 146 TPE, double what he illegally gained, and the money.

(09-16-2017, 05:37 AM)iamslm22 Wrote:Should Carmel Gibson have been allowed to play for us? How is this different? You were calling for our heads on that.

(09-16-2017, 07:41 AM)kckolbe Wrote:The difference to me is that no games have been affected this season.  However, if you take my suggested punishment for Noble and apply it to Gibson, he would have been reduced to -60 TPE, worse than a bot.

(09-16-2017, 05:44 AM)iamslm22 Wrote:Well we suspended him for the season on our own immediately, and ALL games were effected last year by Noble. His TPE effected them in S1 (slightly) and S2 (significantly). The Yeti shouldn't be punished, but they just happen to have a bad guy. Just like IRL the Browns shouldn't be punished for Josh Gordon or the Cowboys for Elliot, but shit like this happens IRL. They should absolutely be without Noble. It's not their fault, but they happen to have a player who's a bad dude.

(09-16-2017, 08:06 AM)kckolbe Wrote:I don't like using NFL logic here because NFL teams HAVE to be ready to replace players due to the constant threat of injury.  I understand the logic, but the impact is more significant.

As for Noble, the difference in S1 was negligible, as he started really slow.  And in S2, did it really help him?  He was still a really bad QB, easily bottom half.  Compare that to Gibson who led all TEs in TDs.  Also, did you know that Kyubee only threw ONE interception when targeting Gibson last year?  He threw FIVE targeting Sanderson.  The difference made by Gibson's TPE was felt across the league.

(09-16-2017, 08:08 AM)AdamS Wrote:One of those examples is a guy who smokes weed and the other is almost certainly not guilty of what he was accused of.

<_<

(09-16-2017, 06:09 AM)iamslm22 Wrote:But having the extra TPE likely added at least one win.

(09-16-2017, 08:17 AM)kckolbe Wrote:So, 110 TPE on a 50 TPE player is insignificant.  73 TPE on at 400 TPE player likely added one win.  @Archon, you wanna help with the math?

Man, this inability to be logical when your team is involved is insane.  You are smarter than this and have shown it so many times, but your brain just shuts down when ANY form of bias is present. 

You do have me on one thing, though, which is that the action is more important than the impact.  We KNOW Noble intended to cheat.  For the record, I *did* say that I wanted Noble punished more harshly.  That's my issue with the punishment.  The Yeti lost a lot, but Noble could still come back next year and be a top 4 QB in TPE, possibly top 3.  My proposal would have knocked him down to the middle of the pack and guaranteed he would never be a top tier player.

(09-16-2017, 06:24 AM)iamslm22 Wrote:No dude read my post again, I said I agree with you that the outcome of Gibson's added TPE was more. I didn't say it was insignificant at all. All I was saying is that although it was impactful in the sim (though ER says it didn't effect our win totals when he re simmed the season a bunch), the intent was clearly not there. I specifically said "I don't see how you can argue Gibson is worse, though I can see the argument that it had more of an effect."