(02-26-2018, 01:53 AM)iamslm22 Wrote:Just so everyone is clear it is NOT valid reasoning to edit 24 roster pages on 7 different teams without speaking to anyone first. I received complaints from NUMEROUS General Managers regarding this. This is not valid reasoning.

(02-26-2018, 02:13 AM)RainDelay Wrote:I understand this part, but just because something appears in an instant to not have valid reasoning doesn't mean it isn't indeed valid in the end.

In this particular example, the fear was that he edited player data, ratings, etc. which would sound off a bunch of alarms at first, as it should given the rules and the history of this league. But once the digging was done and it was found he just changed topic titles from "Player 1 QB Season 6" to "(S6) QB - Player One", those alarms should have been properly shut off.

Yes, @Pens should've asked someone, but he did nothing malicious here, and perhaps should have been slapped on the wrist instead.

(02-25-2018, 11:45 PM)To12143 Wrote:Intent shouldn't play a factor in the penalty. The rulebook has a clear penalty for a situation like this, and that guideline should be followed, even if it does seem to be harsh. What he did should be left to the updaters, or to HO when approving players, and if he wanted to remedy the errors in formatting he should have gone to HO before doing anything.

(02-25-2018, 10:53 PM)iamslm22 Wrote:Just so everyone is clear it is NOT valid reasoning to edit 24 roster pages on 7 different teams without speaking to anyone first. I received complaints from NUMEROUS General Managers regarding this. This is not valid reasoning.

(02-26-2018, 02:57 AM)jaskins811 Wrote:I disagree, considers how new he is to the league. Sure, if he was a vet who knew the history of this league and why editing player pages and the likes might be bad to do, but for all Pens knows, he’s just trying to help clean the league up and make it more uniform. Seems kindve excessive to make the penalty this harsh, and now the league might be losing one of its most active new members.

(02-26-2018, 12:01 AM)To12143 Wrote:We can't penalize based on time in the league, that leads to a slippery slope and doesn't hold people accountable for their actions. It really isn't even that harsh of a penalty, the money isn't hard to get back and a moderation suspension doesn't mean all that much, especially considering an NSFL GM (Hendrix) had this same penalty for deleting a post a while back. We can't change penalties, or not penalize based on the user's experience in the league, and while it sucks that he may be losing interest it should be clear to go to HO first before doing anything.

(02-26-2018, 03:07 AM)jaskins811 Wrote:What would make that clear if you have no experience in this league?

(02-24-2018, 12:02 AM)iamslm22 Wrote:So it has come to our attention that @Pens has edited the player pages for 24 different pages. It appears based on the Head Office's evaluation that nothing substantive has been changed other than the title of the posts. However this is unacceptable. Changing the titles on other people's pages (various teams that he is not on) without the permission of the Head Office or the General Managers of those teams is not allowed.

So given the rules in the book Pens will not be allowed to have moderation powers until at least week 3 of season 8. He will also be fined $2,000,000 (@ItsJustBarry tagging you for the money part).

If anyone has any questions please let me know.