[DEV] ISFL Forums
kckolbe punishment - Printable Version

+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: League Office (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Punishments (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=279)
+--- Thread: kckolbe punishment (/showthread.php?tid=11200)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6


kckolbe punishment - bovovovo - 12-04-2018

(12-04-2018, 09:44 AM)kckolbe Wrote:Wow.  One would think I would have been contacted by HO to provide my side prior to a punishment.  I will be appealing.

I find it disgusting that HO waited this long after my article was published before handing down a punishment, yet still apparently chose not to investigate.

If we had announced before the draft “hey this article was a leak” then now everybody knows how the draft went. We didn’t want to take away from the draft experience for prospects.

And we did investigate, hence the “We also know that the results of the 1st round were posted in the Outlaw's war room, and that kckolbe saw the results and knew the results before the article was posted.“ That evidence wasn’t included in this post because it’s sensitive/private but I’ve passed it along to the appeals committee.


kckolbe punishment - JSS - 12-04-2018

smh my head


kckolbe punishment - timeconsumer - 12-04-2018

But muh mock draft average


kckolbe punishment - PaytonM34 - 12-04-2018

(12-04-2018, 10:30 AM)DeathOnReddit Wrote:This is a disgusting act

[Image: giphy.gif]


kckolbe punishment - kckolbe - 12-04-2018

(12-04-2018, 09:00 AM)bovovovo Wrote:If we had announced before the draft “hey this article was a leak” then now everybody knows how the draft went. We didn’t want to take away from the draft experience for prospects.

And we did investigate, hence the “We also know that the results of the 1st round were posted in the Outlaw's war room, and that kckolbe saw the results and knew the results before the article was posted.“ That evidence wasn’t included in this post because it’s sensitive/private but I’ve passed it along to the appeals committee.

You could have contacted me, and there was definitely significant evidence you have not yet mentioned.

I will add detail after work, but this was shoddy work and of poor character. I'm used to this HO, but I expected a lot better of you.


kckolbe punishment - bovovovo - 12-04-2018

(12-04-2018, 03:28 PM)kckolbe Wrote:You could have contacted me, and there was definitely significant evidence you have not yet mentioned.

I will add detail after work, but this was shoddy work and of poor character.  I'm used to this HO, but I expected a lot better of you.

I understand you’re frustrated but, like all HO decisions, this was made by a group of people and there is not always unanimous consensus.


kckolbe punishment - Renrut - 12-04-2018

Here’s a thought...maybe don’t skirt the line of what is laid out in black and white and you won’t get in trouble?


Again, just a thought.



I’ll never understand why people think they can get away with stuff that’s against the rules and then call out HO for their fuck up.

Poor character? Pretty sure “cheating” is listed under qualities of poor character.


kckolbe punishment - manicmav36 - 12-04-2018

(12-04-2018, 04:50 PM)Renrut Wrote:Here’s a thought...maybe don’t skirt the line of what is laid out in black and white and you won’t get in trouble?


Again, just a thought.



I’ll never understand why people think they can get away with stuff that’s against the rules and then call out HO for their fuck up.

Poor character? Pretty sure “cheating” is listed under qualities of poor character.

It's also been publicly stated that if you're in a war room, you should not be posting mock drafts in the media section. So there's that.


kckolbe punishment - Blastmeaway - 12-05-2018

Fuck HO


kckolbe punishment - Muford - 12-05-2018

(12-05-2018, 01:16 AM)Blastmeaway Wrote:Fuck HO