(07-20-2017, 10:11 PM)kckolbe Wrote:Your goal was to have a player with 6 items awaiting grading?  Interesting goal.

I get that nothing is being denied long term, but I can't go back to a game that I already played and retroactively make a tackle.

(07-20-2017, 07:22 PM)adam2552 Wrote:If you have a problem with the system, why don't propose a solution instead of just lazily bitching about the problem?

(07-20-2017, 11:28 PM)kckolbe Wrote:I did post a solution.  In this very thread.  It was only an hour ago, though, so maybe your goal was to not bother considering it until it's been ignored for over a week.  Here it is again:

"I get that you've gotten some players overestimating the value of their pending work, but instead of cutting this off cold turkey, couldn't we instead say that you simply can't go below ZERO for gear, but still allow pending work? This would ensure that no one came close to the -2 million cut off."

(07-20-2017, 07:35 PM)Grapehead Wrote:That just overcomplicates thing in my opinion. The problem here seems to be that media is sitting for at least a week before being graded. It will never be graded instantly but that seems excessive.

(07-20-2017, 09:22 PM)adam2552 Wrote:The goal for graders is to not have articles sit with no replies for more than 7 days.  The last ungraded article's last reply is 7/13.  So yes the graders are currently on the goal that was set for them.

If you have a problem with the system, why don't propose a solution instead of just lazily bitching about the problem?

(07-20-2017, 09:41 PM)ErMurazor Wrote:Could we not just mark and article as graded but keep them all in one section?

A grader could come along, edit the bottom of the article and put "PROCESSED" or whatever. And they can all be in the same spot, regardless of how many comments they have or if they've been graded.

If somebody doesn't want something graded, they could note that.

(07-20-2017, 10:39 PM)CubsFan19 Wrote:I know im new so i apologize for overstepping my boundaries but its a poor system. Plenty of solutions were offered and it seems you are fine with how things are going while several arent. I have 4.3 million worth of articles posted so i should be able to claim them for equipment purposes. Otherwise they will sit for a minimum of 7 days or more if someone wants to comment on it 3 days later, making me wait a total of 10 days before i can claim my earned cash to apply tpe. Sorry but it doesn't make sense and that is why no other sim league works like that.

(07-20-2017, 09:47 PM)adam2552 Wrote:Its not that I'm not willing to change, but changing a whole system doesn't happen with the snap of my fingers.  A couple posts back I said I was working on the specifics for Grapehead's proposed solution.  And I am trying to think it through and see other suggestions, before we jump to a new system just for the sake of jumping to a new system as quickly as possible.

(07-20-2017, 10:41 PM)ErMurazor Wrote:Could we not just mark and article as graded but keep them all in one section?

A grader could come along, edit the bottom of the article and put "PROCESSED" or whatever. And they can all be in the same spot, regardless of how many comments they have or if they've been graded.

If somebody doesn't want something graded, they could note that.