![[DEV] ISFL Forums](http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/images/emerald/logo.png "[DEV] ISFL Forums"){kind=logo}
+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+---- Thread: Dear Media (/showthread.php?tid=23460)
Dear Media - DarknessRising - 07-11-2020
(07-11-2020, 02:24 PM)manicmav36 Wrote:Is no one taught to attempt to personally handle problems first anymore? You have an issue with a person, you speak to them directly first. You know, like an adult.
This whole situation could've been easily avoided if someone, almost literally anyone, had brought this up to Joe personally. No one did, and here we are. Never mind the out of context comment leaked from a personal message meant to frame Joe in a negative light.
Building on this, whilst things should be attempted to be handled privately first before going public, i read the original post more leaning on the side of a slam on the media team, than opening up a discussion about the boundaries and the situation at hand. Whilst it is definitely not intended to be a slam or insulting them at all, it could definitely have been written in a different way to promote the idea of getting some feedback from the media team and asking for answers, rather than questioning the decisions that were made.
For something over 1 media article, it's gotten really out of hand. Points from people on either side are valid and to me, it lies somewhere in the middle as to how we move forward. There should have been some feedback or information relayed if the article wasn't to be graded. The article should only be graded based on itself, not factoring in the money earnt from others. Though if there is continuous fringe cases of whether it is league related or not by the same user, then inform them they are pushing the boundaries.
Things seemingly have calmed down on here, let's try and keep it this way and when a result is achieved between the parties involved and not with everyone else in between, then we can discuss civilly what that means for future media posts that have less league stories but more character development/other stories.
Dear Media - Saliva^ - 07-11-2020
(07-10-2020, 09:23 PM)ADwyer87 Wrote:and Norfolk worst folk
delete this nephew
Dear Media - Memento Mori - 07-11-2020
(07-11-2020, 06:16 AM)DarknessRising Wrote:The article should only be graded based on itself, not factoring in the money earnt from others.A couple of things I said have been misinterpreted - apologies if I didn’t make myself clear. I brought up the fact we’ve paid out $78m to her including millions in bonuses specifically for her creativity as a counterpoint to Isa's claim SchwarzNarr was being unfairly punished for her creativity/the general idea that we'd been extraordinarily harsh. We don’t grade according to bank balance.
Dear Media - IsaStarcrossed - 07-11-2020
(07-10-2020, 10:24 PM)manicmav36 Wrote:Is no one taught to attempt to personally handle problems first anymore? You have an issue with a person, you speak to them directly first. You know, like an adult.
This whole situation could've been easily avoided if someone, almost literally anyone, had brought this up to Joe personally. No one did, and here we are. Nevermind the out of context comment leaked from a personal message meant to frame Joe in a negative light.
To be fair it wasn't out of context at all. I went to Joe about it first and that was literally the only response I got back. Which at the time seemed dismissive and like he wasn't going to bother with it. To me it read as "I'm not going to argue with you.". That is how we got here. Since then, Joe and I have spoken and it was realized as a misunderstanding.
Dear Media - retrospace111 - 07-11-2020
Why the hell do people who write long ass media pieces about the NSFL get paid out the same as someone who rambles about DnD for thousands of words. Some people put a lot of effort into their media (iSteg) and there’s a lot of stuff behind the scenes that goes into these articles. If we’re paying out nearly the same money to articles that didn’t take as much effort and are barely league related, then what are we doing? Seems like it’s NOLA/Norfolk v the league ????