[DEV] ISFL Forums
*The ISFL with another questionable decision - Printable Version

+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+---- Thread: *The ISFL with another questionable decision (/showthread.php?tid=28303)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - siddhus - 12-15-2020

(12-15-2020, 04:38 PM)Laser Wrote: I'm with Babs. For a player that doesn't have time/ability/motivation/whatever to write the full 400 words then posting in the thread should be counted as participation TPE. There's no need to be stingy about 1 TPE especially when the post heavily implied that all you had to do was post for 1 extra tep. It's frankly worrisome to see so many people saying some variation of "you should have known better" when obviously the post should have made it known clearly. The users are not all-knowing.
He didn’t need 400 words. He didn’t even need 100 words, all he needed to do was write something on topic to the prompt.


RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - Sushi - 12-15-2020

r/gatekeeping


RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - .Laser - 12-15-2020

(12-15-2020, 04:40 PM)Jo3fish5 Wrote:
(12-15-2020, 04:38 PM)Laser Wrote: I'm with Babs. For a player that doesn't have time/ability/motivation/whatever to write the full 400 words then posting in the thread should be counted as participation TPE. There's no need to be stingy about 1 TPE especially when the post heavily implied that all you had to do was post for 1 extra tep. It's frankly worrisome to see so many people saying some variation of "you should have known better" when obviously the post should have made it known clearly. The users are not all-knowing.
Yes but literally all he has to do for one tpe is “I’m thankful for the league” or something like that.
Why are you so worried about it? It's one TPE for one player. Being stingy about one very ambiguously defined TPE is questionable at best and you've been the biggest person campaigning against it in this thread that I've seen. For what?
(12-15-2020, 04:49 PM)siddhus Wrote:
(12-15-2020, 04:38 PM)Laser Wrote: I'm with Babs. For a player that doesn't have time/ability/motivation/whatever to write the full 400 words then posting in the thread should be counted as participation TPE. There's no need to be stingy about 1 TPE especially when the post heavily implied that all you had to do was post for 1 extra tep. It's frankly worrisome to see so many people saying some variation of "you should have known better" when obviously the post should have made it known clearly. The users are not all-knowing.
He didn’t need 400 words. He didn’t even need 100 words, all he needed to do was write something on topic to the prompt.
So then define that in the post. I understand where you're coming from sidd and I don't mean to come at you as I doubt it was solely your decision, you were just the one who posted it. But if the post says "1 participation" then it means that they just have to post in the thread. If the post says "Participation must be on topic" then you avoid this altogether. Not giving the users who did just say "give participation tpe" their 1 TPE is like going back and changing the rules after it's already done and we should not be supporting that as a league.


RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - Wombat - 12-15-2020

imagine doing the PT at all kekw


RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - r0tzbua - 12-15-2020

(12-15-2020, 05:09 PM)Laser Wrote: So then define that in the post. I understand where you're coming from sidd and I don't mean to come at you as I doubt it was solely your decision, you were just the one who posted it. But if the post says "1 participation" then it means that they just have to post in the thread. If the post says "Participation must be on topic" then you avoid this altogether. Not giving the users who did just say "give participation tpe" their 1 TPE is like going back and changing the rules after it's already done and we should not be supporting that as a league.

It's a point task, it's not an activity check, it's an obvious point task with a briefing and something to write about. I think we can and should expect at least a tiny bit of reading and thinking about what you do in PTs since that has always been the case. Of course people can go ahead and define every single thing what people are expected to do for a minimum amount of participation but is this really who we think we should be? You are part of this league, you want to get something, then do something for it. If a user wants to phone it in, sure go ahead, there are places like activity checks where you literally have to do nothing but say "hey, I'm here", but we should be able to expect to at least have a tiny bit of thought about basic things like that.

Then again we live in a world where a hot coffee you ordered has to say "CAUTION HOT" on the cup so what do I know.

Interestingly enough probably 90% of the people understood the directions and participated I guess?


RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - Memento Mori - 12-15-2020

Teyon's take is pretty much spot on. Why not just specify all the rules of the PT and how TPE is awarded instead of some of them?


RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - LewisMelville - 12-15-2020

This is @frazzle14 fault gets his kicks out of lesser earners suffering


RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - frazzle14 - 12-15-2020

(12-15-2020, 05:44 PM)LewisMelville Wrote: This is @frazzle14 fault gets his kicks out of lesser earners suffering

Stop kinkshaming me smh @LewisMelville


RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - RotticusScott - 12-15-2020

As someone who had 70 tpe stolen from me early in my career from crooked HO, I support you babs!


RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - SDCore - 12-15-2020

I forgot to do it, cause I was busy, but I mean to and if meaning to do it counts as much as actually doing it, does that mean I actually did it? Where is my 1 TPE for participating in spirit? JUSTICE FOR THE SPIRIT OF DOING PTS