(01-19-2021, 07:08 PM)mithrandir Wrote: I don't think it is pathetic at all to be really invested in this hobby we've all put a lot of time and energy into. I do believe that some voters do not put a lot of thought and research into their ballots, and I agree with your fear that the greater availability of statistical information in the new sim will make little difference on how some teams and HO members vote.

(01-19-2021, 05:51 PM)CalvinGolladay Wrote: There are like 3 OL statistics, how did my guys Buckley and Thruster not get unanimous noms

(01-19-2021, 06:20 PM)qWest Wrote:

(01-19-2021, 06:15 PM)slate Wrote:

(01-19-2021, 06:06 PM)qWest Wrote: Also the "efficiency" argument is just silly as a point to vote for someone over someone else with 2x the TDs and 3.5x the pancakes. If an RB rushes for 3.4 ypc they get a first down every 3 downs. Anything after that is bonus. What should matter way more than how quickly a player produces positive plays for an offense is the number of positive plays they produce, especially when it directly gets points on the board.

Ah yes, this is why RBs that can average 3.4 ypc are a hot commodity in all levels of football.

Ask literally any coach of any football team ever if they'd rather have a player with 1.1 more ypc or 8 more TDs and see how that goes.

(01-19-2021, 05:47 PM)SDCore Wrote: Imagine making the probowl but not being on the ballot for DRoTY... Couldn't be me.

(01-19-2021, 06:04 PM)ZootTX Wrote:

(01-19-2021, 06:00 PM)Nokazoa Wrote:

(01-19-2021, 05:49 PM)Nokazoa Wrote:

(01-19-2021, 05:47 PM)SDCore Wrote: Imagine making the probowl but not being on the ballot for DRoTY... Couldn't be me.

I think Mccormick wasn't on ballot for TEoty

Nvm I've been corrected. I was in the final five ballot?

Yes, you were on the ballot.

(01-19-2021, 08:00 PM)Nokazoa Wrote: HI zoot.