(07-17-2021, 03:13 AM)AdamS Wrote: I knew those two rules (12 and 13) looked so oddly specific that they had to be for something. I even asked someone if it was fixing a prior punishment. Well this answers that. This is kinda shitty. Neccesary but shitty. I bet no one in HO really felt good about this usage of a neccesary new rule be uase of other people's more malicious actions.

(07-17-2021, 11:30 AM)slate Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 03:13 AM)AdamS Wrote: I knew those two rules (12 and 13) looked so oddly specific that they had to be for something. I even asked someone if it was fixing a prior punishment. Well this answers that. This is kinda shitty. Neccesary but shitty. I bet no one in HO really felt good about this usage of a neccesary new rule be uase of other people's more malicious actions.

They were clearly in response to the YoungTB situation, weird to insinuate that they were somehow proposed with foreknowledge of this specific case.

(07-17-2021, 11:30 AM)slate Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 03:13 AM)AdamS Wrote: I knew those two rules (12 and 13) looked so oddly specific that they had to be for something. I even asked someone if it was fixing a prior punishment. Well this answers that. This is kinda shitty. Neccesary but shitty. I bet no one in HO really felt good about this usage of a neccesary new rule be uase of other people's more malicious actions.

They were clearly in response to the YoungTB situation, weird to insinuate that they were somehow proposed with foreknowledge of this specific case.

(07-17-2021, 11:26 AM)124715 Wrote: Which is why it's unfortunate that a rule created during the second account's career was applied to it.

(07-17-2021, 09:09 AM)AdamS Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 03:35 AM)Jimi64 Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 03:13 AM)AdamS Wrote: And I'm sorry that now there are people reacts g negatively towards others because they kept you a secret. "Oh no I liked Jiggly. Eww gross."

Don't even have a problem with Jiggly here, actually quite sympathetic to the situation and understand why a fresh start was desired. 

But you can't deny some well respected users helped conspire to keep a multi account user secret when not being sure if it was legal for a whole season. Don't think that's kinda messed up? These people were in war rooms at the time of the draft, and it would take a lot of convincing to make me think that knowledge of jggly's second account wasn't used.

No one's trying to deny that multiple respected users were involved as far as I can see. Generally when one points an Ace Attorney style figure to demand that someone admit something is true, there should be some leadup to that being in question first. Rather than everyone already agreeing to it ahead of time. 

Now, as generally agreed by everyone, several high profile users including 3 former members of HO were approached and asked about it and all seem to have come to the conclusion that it was in good faith and not actually against the rules as they existed. I know you framed it as "not sure if legal" and all that conspiratorial negative busoness but there's usually a term for things that aren't in the rulebook. It's legal. And if it wasn't, there wouldn't be not own but two new rules making it illegal. 

Is it messed up? I don't think so. I can think of some other things in the very recent past that were totally messed up though.

I wouldn't expect the league's Rita Skeeter to see the issue with stirring the pot yet again so quickly though. 

Someone wanted something positive and others helped. Others who's judgement is well regarded. If you view that as a negative it's because you brought that negativity with you. Now you may go. I'm sure you have a "what entirely negative opinions about every member of HO" article to work on.

(07-17-2021, 07:23 AM)infinitempg Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 03:35 AM)Jimi64 Wrote: Don't even have a problem with Jiggly here, actually quite sympathetic to the situation and understand why a fresh start was desired. 

But you can't deny some well respected users helped conspire to keep a multi account user secret when not being sure if it was legal for a whole season. Don't think that's kinda messed up? These people were in war rooms at the time of the draft, and it would take a lot of convincing to make me think that knowledge of jggly's second account wasn't used.

Also, and you can ask Frick and Hall this, I did NOT tell Baltimore about this. I told NO ONE. Since we're going after some teams having an advantage and all.

I can't speak for the others, but that's my final statement on this. Come by to my DMs to yell at me if you want.