![[DEV] ISFL Forums](http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/images/emerald/logo.png "[DEV] ISFL Forums"){kind=logo}
+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Announcements (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=495)
+--- Forum: Announcements (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Forum: GM Announcements (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=166)
+---- Thread: Response to Portland Management Change (/showthread.php?tid=21541)
Response to Portland Management Change - Duilio05 - 04-23-2020
(04-23-2020, 12:04 PM)Vorshayla Wrote:"well, there's no one else to do it"
That is false.
We voted knowing there were users selected as potential commissioner replacements before voting.
If a single HO or GM Yes vote had been No instead, Bex would not have been reinstated as commish.
You think all 24 NSFL GMs would sit aside and let a single person in HO play favorites when handing out decisions?
Response to Portland Management Change - Duilio05 - 04-23-2020
(04-23-2020, 08:47 AM)RainDelay Wrote:Actually I’m not sure this is the case. When I mentioned that I was recruiting from a Discord server, I thought I was going to be guillotined in the town square.
did you ever post to their server? gave you the green light.
Response to Portland Management Change - Billybolo53 - 04-23-2020
(04-23-2020, 12:22 PM)iseedoug Wrote:Preach Brother. Go Broncos!
Dude even worse. Chiefs or nothin
Response to Portland Management Change - iseedoug - 04-23-2020
(04-23-2020, 01:59 PM)Billybolo53 Wrote:Dude even worse. Chiefs or nothin
oof. and I thought we could be friends.
Response to Portland Management Change - jeffie43 - 04-23-2020
I've tried to stay out of this mostly because I don't really care about it but people saying I tampered Gabe need to go talk to the man himself. He literally told multiple people in the league he wanted to recreate and he was asking me the steps in order to recreate. Yes I told him to retire but that was literally in response to him asking me what were the steps needed in order to recreate and there was proof of that sent out. If you're saying I did it maliciously to hurt Norfolk that's really stupid, when you just think about it how much would losing a 57 TPE OL hurt Norfolk? I've probably said it as a joke here and there and sure, it probably looks like it was in bad taste but if you're saying I did it on purpose to hurt Norfolk that's almost laughable. The reality is I just wanted my friend to come back to the league and he was the one that insisted on playing with multiple people in MB.
Don't believe me? Ask him yourself. Simple.
Response to Portland Management Change - RainDelay - 04-23-2020
(04-23-2020, 01:57 PM)Duilio05 Wrote:did you ever post to their server? gave you the green light.
The dude never got back to me.
Response to Portland Management Change - Unicorn - 04-23-2020
(04-23-2020, 02:24 PM)jeffie43 Wrote:I've tried to stay out of this mostly because I don't really care about it but people saying I tampered Gabe need to go talk to the man himself. He literally told multiple people in the league he wanted to recreate and he was asking me the steps in order to recreate. Yes I told him to retire but that was literally in response to him asking me what were the steps needed in order to recreate and there was proof of that sent out. If you're saying I did it maliciously to hurt Norfolk that's really stupid, when you just think about it how much would losing a 57 TPE OL hurt Norfolk? I've probably said it as a joke here and there and sure, it probably looks like it was in bad taste but if you're saying I did it on purpose to hurt Norfolk that's almost laughable. The reality is I just wanted my friend to come back to the league and he was the one that insisted on playing with multiple people in MB.Why don't you just post the screenshots yourself if you're so confident there was no tampering?
Don't believe me? Ask him yourself. Simple.
Response to Portland Management Change - jeffie43 - 04-23-2020
(04-23-2020, 02:44 PM)Unicorn Wrote:Why don't you just post the screenshots yourself if you're so confident there was no tampering?
I don't post screenshots of a private convo in a public setting, multiple people have seen screenshots via DMs including those on the appeals team and Spec who has stated so.
Response to Portland Management Change - Unicorn - 04-23-2020
(04-23-2020, 02:48 PM)jeffie43 Wrote:I don't post screenshots of a private convo in a public setting, multiple people have seen screenshots via DMs including those on the appeals team and Spec who has stated so.and those people on HO and the appeals team thought it was tampering. Yet you come in here trying to contradict everything that was stated in the original punishment thread with no proof.
Response to Portland Management Change - Billybolo53 - 04-23-2020
(04-23-2020, 01:53 PM)Unicorn Wrote:and those people on HO and the appeals team thought it was tampering. Yet you come in here trying to contradict everything that was stated in the original punishment thread with no proof.
He's shown as much proof as HO has. It should go both ways with evidence