![]() |
Baltimore - Las Vegas Trade (7/8/17) - Printable Version +- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums) +-- Forum: League Office (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Team Transactions (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=43) +---- Forum: Trades (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=152) +----- Forum: Processed Trades (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=91) +----- Thread: Baltimore - Las Vegas Trade (7/8/17) (/showthread.php?tid=1896) |
Baltimore - Las Vegas Trade (7/8/17) - RavensFanFromOntario - 07-09-2017 (07-09-2017, 02:01 PM)adam2552 Wrote:It could be, if RFFO and me each had players we wanted, I'm sure we would have discussed that going into the draft. And even if the other team took him, he could be traded for likely for a price less than what they paid. Is it possible I have a clue what I'm doing? :lol: there's still good players in expansion. Baltimore - Las Vegas Trade (7/8/17) - adam2552 - 07-09-2017 (07-09-2017, 02:27 PM)RavensFanFromOntario Wrote:I think people are saying I'm a bit of a dick for doing it, or it shouldn't have been allowed, not that I'm dumb for doing so... :shrug: I'm not trying to imply that you're dumb, more that you're reckless. Baltimore - Las Vegas Trade (7/8/17) - ADwyer87 - 07-09-2017 (07-09-2017, 01:08 PM)RavensFanFromOntario Wrote:Is it possible I have a clue what I'm doing?*looks at username* no, definitely not ![]() Baltimore - Las Vegas Trade (7/8/17) - Noble - 07-09-2017 Six pages of debating if getting mostly inactive free players is better than getting active players AND still getting around the same amount of mostly inactive free players? Hmm. Baltimore - Las Vegas Trade (7/8/17) - Jogn - 07-09-2017 If only these two competing philosophies were being trialled by different teams. I wish we had some way, say in about 7 weeks at the end of Season 2, to compare which strategy was more effective. If there was a 100 TPE corner on the board at the top of the 3rd round, I think Vegas would take that player so I'm sitting on the side of the move being Probably Good. Baltimore - Las Vegas Trade (7/8/17) - adam2552 - 07-09-2017 I give up. Apparently opportunity cost is not a real thing. Baltimore - Las Vegas Trade (7/8/17) - Jogn - 07-09-2017 (07-09-2017, 11:34 AM)adam2552 Wrote:I give up. Apparently opportunity cost is not a real thing. Don't worry man it's not the last thing that the Liberty will be giving up on this season Baltimore - Las Vegas Trade (7/8/17) - Stormblessed - 07-09-2017 (07-09-2017, 12:34 PM)adam2552 Wrote:I give up. Apparently opportunity cost is not a real thing. Let's assume everything you've said is correct (for the record I vehemently disagree with what you're saying) but let's suppose. Vegas decided that paying an extra cost to secure the players they wanted was worth it. An expansion draft is an uncertain proposition. Vegas and Philly are not teammates. You and Vegas can't collude. Opportunity cost doesn't factor into an uncertain environment. I still don't understand the problem you're having. It honestly just sounds like you're upset that your team is behind? Baltimore - Las Vegas Trade (7/8/17) - adam2552 - 07-09-2017 (07-09-2017, 03:38 PM)Jogn Wrote:Don't worry man it's not the last thing that the Liberty will be giving up on this season We'll see, the offseason hasn't even started yet. Baltimore - Las Vegas Trade (7/8/17) - ErMurazor - 07-09-2017 (07-08-2017, 06:02 PM)ADwyer87 Wrote:Not the ASFC Championship game ![]() |