![[DEV] ISFL Forums](http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/images/emerald/logo.png "[DEV] ISFL Forums"){kind=logo}
+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+---- Thread: *DSFL HO Sux Lmap (/showthread.php?tid=28363)
RE: *DSFL HO Sux Lmap - AdamS - 12-24-2020
(12-24-2020, 06:57 AM)Memento Mori Wrote: Appreciate the clarity on this and I’ll amend the original post to include your clarification on the appeals ruling.
However I would like to point out that DSFL HO’s interpretation of the rule was the thing we specifically appealed. I find it quite disappointing that this wasn’t considered as I guess that means the precedent that DSFL HO set has been unchallenged and the points Adam and I made about GMs being able to hold players hostage appear to apply.
challenging ho's decision on what rules means isnt really the appeals' team's area though
RE: *DSFL HO Sux Lmap - manicmav36 - 12-24-2020
(12-24-2020, 11:08 AM)AdamS Wrote:(12-24-2020, 06:57 AM)Memento Mori Wrote: Appreciate the clarity on this and I’ll amend the original post to include your clarification on the appeals ruling.
However I would like to point out that DSFL HO’s interpretation of the rule was the thing we specifically appealed. I find it quite disappointing that this wasn’t considered as I guess that means the precedent that DSFL HO set has been unchallenged and the points Adam and I made about GMs being able to hold players hostage appear to apply.
challenging ho's decision on what rules means isnt really the appeals' team's area though
This man speaks the truth.
RE: *DSFL HO Sux Lmap - Frick_Nasty - 12-24-2020
Fold league when?