![]() |
*The ISFL with another questionable decision - Printable Version +- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums) +-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38) +---- Thread: *The ISFL with another questionable decision (/showthread.php?tid=28303) |
RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - Drizzy - 12-15-2020 (12-15-2020, 07:55 PM)White Cornerback Wrote: when did RED join the ISFL with these paragraphs, think im gonna be sickThis is a deep reference Also give the 1 tpe RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - Frostbite - 12-15-2020 (12-15-2020, 06:41 PM)jdourtled Wrote: Activity Check = 2 TPESorry, it's been filled. Better luck next time RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - Southie - 12-15-2020 My only question is why is this in ISFL media instead of ISFL discussion? RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - LGMForever - 12-15-2020 (12-15-2020, 06:14 PM)SDCore Wrote:Lol, if you think I was being serious, then I don't know how to talk to you.(12-15-2020, 06:10 PM)LGMForever Wrote:(12-15-2020, 06:04 PM)SDCore Wrote:Well duh, you made the take(12-15-2020, 06:00 PM)Memento Mori Wrote:(12-15-2020, 05:57 PM)SDCore Wrote: I forgot to do it, cause I was busy, but I mean to and if meaning to do it counts as much as actually doing it, does that mean I actually did it? Where is my 1 TPE for participating in spirit? JUSTICE FOR THE SPIRIT OF DOING PTSThis is the worst take in this thread and that's saying something RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - Trautner - 12-15-2020 carl wheezer from downtown!! RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - MisObvious - 12-16-2020 Wheezer running circles round y'all RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - AdamS - 12-16-2020 Here's how I feel about it. If we're going to be nitpicky enough to claim that the user has to follow a rule that isn't written down....then the user can be nitpicky enough to claim "1 participation tpe" is an expression of why they love the league. That's if you're hellbent on enforcing standards you didnt set. I'm not a fan of enforcing rules you dont make first. When you separate the participation as its own tpe outside of whatever length they choose to write about....and you dont specify what participation looks like...I dont really see how you get to come back later and decide what counts as participation. You had the chance and responsibility to do that to start with. You chose not to. If nothing else the 1 tpe should be given as a reminder of the consequence of not setting the standard to start with. Other than that tis been an interesting thread. A rookie making a name. An argument that isnt HO's fault yet. And one user admitting that when McDonalds attacked an old lady for something they'd already been told not to do his choice was to believe McDonalds. RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - 37thchamber - 12-16-2020 the funny thing here, for me, is that you seem to think that an additional note would have helped. as if people in this league follow instructions, lol. even the fucking activity check instructions here had to be changed because people didn't follow them. RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - NicholasTheGreat - 12-16-2020 ![]() RE: The ISFL with another questionable decision - ScorpXCracker - 12-16-2020 yall i read the original thread back then can i get tpe for participation |