[DEV] ISFL Forums
701 6/11 - Printable Version

+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Graphics (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=39)
+---- Forum: Graded Weekly Submissions (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=41)
+---- Thread: 701 6/11 (/showthread.php?tid=1010)



701 6/11 - 701 - 06-05-2017

[Image: cN60AMH.png]

[Image: tKLV2Lt.png]

[Image: BxwZ5UG.png]

[Image: pW5BShp.png]


701 6/11 - NUCK - 06-05-2017

Sick dude!

The Law sig is my favorite for sure.


701 6/11 - 701 - 06-06-2017

@youngcricket added


701 6/11 - youngcricket - 06-06-2017

love <3


701 6/11 - Noble - 06-06-2017

This sigs are all fire as fuck


701 6/11 - Durden - 06-06-2017

These are fire as usual.


701 6/11 - NUCK - 06-15-2017

Sig A: 5

Easily the best one, only negitive would be the text is just a touch to dark, may just be my screen

$750,000

Sig B: 4

Least favorite for sure, I do see where you were going it just didnt work out well. The text is great until the C in Carter, its to dark and not legiable behind the shadowing. Becuase the name is a huge part of this signature, you hurt its all around appeal as that corner just looks like a dark brush engulfed it. The right side was perfect, the left went way to darm

$600,000

Sig C: 3

Great potential here but you lost me. The render is wicked and every thing about the render area of the sig is great. The text works although plain. What bothers me is the other 75% of the sig and how it flows. The low opacity 2nd render works decent .. its just not right and I cant seem to come up with the vocabulary to explain it.

$450,000

Sig D: 5

Great text, great render, good layering. The lighting over his head is to bright or just to far down in the sig itself but its very minor. Good job.

$750,000


701 6/11 - Kendrick - 06-15-2017

That one got a 3? Damn I have no hope of getting a 1 then. That sig is amazing.