![]() |
OCO brings back a very dynamic duo - Printable Version +- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums) +-- Forum: League Office (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Team Transactions (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=43) +---- Forum: ISFL Transactions (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=159) +----- Forum: Processed Transactions (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=223) +----- Thread: OCO brings back a very dynamic duo (/showthread.php?tid=10586) Pages:
1
2
|
OCO brings back a very dynamic duo - speculadora - 10-06-2018 After their brief hiatuses, the Otters are thrilled to welcome back this pair of receivers: ![]() S11: $10,000,000 ![]() S11: $8,000,000 OCO brings back a very dynamic duo - JKortesi81 - 10-06-2018 It’s complete bullshit that Atwell makes more money than me. Accept, but fuck this nonsense. OCO brings back a very dynamic duo - kckolbe - 10-06-2018 Well, looks like Showbiz will be the better QB this year. OCO brings back a very dynamic duo - Jiggly_333 - 10-06-2018 (10-06-2018, 01:48 PM)JKortesi81 Wrote:It’s complete bullshit that Atwell makes more money than me. ![]() Also, I accept OCO brings back a very dynamic duo - Dangles13 - 10-06-2018 These big numbers make me jealous. OCO brings back a very dynamic duo - Daybe - 10-06-2018 @`BayleyIsland` got cucked I can see OCO as a legitimate threat to NOLA next year actually OCO brings back a very dynamic duo - speculadora - 10-06-2018 (10-06-2018, 04:10 PM)Dangles13 Wrote:These big numbers make me jealous. soon... :eyes: OCO brings back a very dynamic duo - Dangles13 - 10-06-2018 (10-06-2018, 02:23 PM)speculadora Wrote:soon... :eyes: Tampering!! OCO brings back a very dynamic duo - kckolbe - 10-06-2018 (10-06-2018, 01:14 PM)Daybe Wrote:@`BayleyIsland` got cucked And OCO looks like the favorite in S12. OCO brings back a very dynamic duo - Daybe - 10-06-2018 (10-06-2018, 01:44 PM)kckolbe Wrote:And OCO looks like the favorite in S12. No love for ![]() |