![]() |
Jorel Tuck Punishment - Printable Version +- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums) +-- Forum: League Office (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Punishments (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=279) +--- Thread: Jorel Tuck Punishment (/showthread.php?tid=14310) |
Jorel Tuck Punishment - ADwyer87 - 07-16-2019 Hello all, It was brought to our attention that an illegal contract extension was signed. Jorel Tuck made this update recently that put him over into the next minimum tier. However, he also signed this contract extension about a month ago. After checking the TPE, We determined that he was indeed over the contract minimum at the point of signing. This violates rule VI.D.12, and punishment will be as such: - Jorel Tuck's contract will be corrected for this season - Jorel Tuck will be fined 5% of his post-update TPE, amounting to a 43 TPE loss - San Jose will be fined 2M in S17 for an invalid contract With any punishment, San Jose or Jorel Tuck are allowed to appeal this decision thank you, and have a nice day Jorel Tuck Punishment - ckroyal92 - 07-16-2019 I can't speak officially for Andrew, but I'm 99% sure we'll be appealing because this is total crap. Jorel Tuck Punishment - karl - 07-16-2019 a month? lol. that's weak. Jorel Tuck Punishment - ErMurazor - 07-16-2019 (07-16-2019, 05:59 PM)karl Wrote:a month? lol. that's weak. It was actually 80 days....11+ weeks Jorel Tuck Punishment - Keyg_an - 07-16-2019 If he wanted to circumvent wouldn't he have signed a max term contract? Seems like a reach. Jorel Tuck Punishment - Raven - 07-17-2019 Think y`all just fell victum to ER's absolute garbage update style. It may not have been on purpose, but this still circumvents min contract. Jorel Tuck Punishment - Raven - 07-17-2019 also, damn HO you're going to hurt your backs with these kinds of reaches Jorel Tuck Punishment - ckroyal92 - 07-18-2019 (07-17-2019, 04:33 AM)Raven Wrote:Think y`all just fell victum to ER's absolute garbage update style. It may not have been on purpose, but this still circumvents min contract.I did the math. At most, it circumvents by 11 TPE Jorel Tuck Punishment - Raven - 07-18-2019 (07-18-2019, 06:34 PM)ckroyal92 Wrote:I did the math. At most, it circumvents by 11 TPE So it does circumvent it Jorel Tuck Punishment - timeconsumer - 07-18-2019 The word multi is used exactly zero times in this punishment and I find that unacceptable. |