![]() |
*Power Ratings - Week 11 - Printable Version +- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums) +-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38) +---- Thread: *Power Ratings - Week 11 (/showthread.php?tid=16276) |
*Power Ratings - Week 11 - speculadora - 11-02-2019 For any who missed the first week I did this, here's a quick run down of how the ratings are calculated and what they mean: Quote:I wanted to be as scientific about this as I could be, and I remembered that Bill James - who is mostly famous for baseball data analysis - has a formula he uses to make NFL power rankings. I won't even bother trying to walk through it because Bill does so quite a bit more effectively than I could anyway. The only significant changes I made were 1) making home field advantage worth 4.5 points (based on some other math I did) and 2) what I describe in the following paragraph. Anyway, here's the link breaking down the methodology: https://www.billjamesonline.com/article808/ If you're paying attention you'll notice that every team saw a decrease in their "raw" rating from Week 10 to Week 11. Part of this is just an annoying function of the code. In essence it's trying to find a balance whereby all of the game margins line up. Using the Butchers as an example, they need to be roughly 1 point better than Baltimore, but 1 point worse than Colorado, who is roughly 33 cumulative points worse than Baltimore. So the loop iterates over and over and tries to find the ratings that best satisfy those conditions. So sometimes the total sum of ratings will be high for that to work out, and sometimes it will be low. In other words, the Wraiths aren't 5 points worse than they were in Week 10. They're 5.3 points better than the Otters as of Week 11, or 8.2 points better than the Outlaws as of Week 11, etc. These differences between teams are roughly more comparable from week-to-week than comparing a team to itself. Raw Ratings Ranking - Team - Rating 1. ![]() 2. ![]() 3. ![]() 4. ![]() 5. ![]() 6. ![]() 7. ![]() 8. ![]() 9. ![]() 10. ![]() Now the scaled ratings we can compare. I think. They're scaled to the average raw rating for that week, so they should be pretty comparable. Scaled Ratings Ranking - Team - Rating+ (Change) 1. ![]() 2. ![]() 3. ![]() 4. ![]() 5. ![]() 6. ![]() 7. ![]() 8. ![]() 9. ![]() 10. ![]() Predicting Week 12 Spreads All lines are expressed through the home team and are just calculated based on the difference in raw rating with an adjustment for HFA, rounded to the nearest "half-integer". For any unfamiliar with what these mean, a -19 means the team is favored by 19, a +6 means the team is a six point underdog. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() *Power Ratings - Week 11 - shadyshoelace - 11-02-2019 Ok sure but where are the over/unders mr stat man |