![[DEV] ISFL Forums](http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/images/emerald/logo.png "[DEV] ISFL Forums"){kind=logo}
+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+---- Thread: Why O'Leary should be WRoTY (/showthread.php?tid=22354)
Why O'Leary should be WRoTY - HalfEatenOnionBagel - 05-22-2020
Why? Because fuck you that's why
Why O'Leary should be WRoTY - BenDover - 05-22-2020
(05-22-2020, 07:56 PM)HalfEatenOnionBagel Wrote:Why? Because fuck you that's why
Can’t argue with that
Why O'Leary should be WRoTY - HalfEatenOnionBagel - 05-22-2020
(05-22-2020, 07:04 PM)BenDover Wrote:Can’t argue with that
Why O'Leary should be WRoTY - Blueline - 05-22-2020
Anyone else catch over a 100 yards in a game with a 50 tpe QB?!? Anyone else break 1,000 yards on the season with a 50 tpe QB?!? Amateurs.
Why O'Leary should be WRoTY - HalfEatenOnionBagel - 05-22-2020
(05-22-2020, 09:41 PM)Blueline Wrote:Anyone else catch over a 100 yards in a game with a 50 tpe QB?!? Anyone else break 1,000 yards on the season with a 50 tpe QB?!? Amateurs.
Can't argue with that
Why O'Leary should be WRoTY - Faded - 05-22-2020
(05-22-2020, 05:04 PM)BenDover Wrote:Can’t argue with that
Why O'Leary should be WRoTY - TheCC - 05-23-2020
Didn't even read the article but I agree. Sorry, I'm sure you made some great points :/
Why O'Leary should be WRoTY - HalfEatenOnionBagel - 05-23-2020
(05-23-2020, 12:17 AM)TheCC Wrote:Didn't even read the article but I agree. Sorry, I'm sure you made some great points :/
Can't argue with that