[DEV] ISFL Forums
retrospace111 Appeals Decision - Printable Version

+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: League Office (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Punishments (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=279)
+---- Forum: Appeals Decisions (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=472)
+---- Thread: retrospace111 Appeals Decision (/showthread.php?tid=22511)

retrospace111 Appeals Decision - woelkers - 05-27-2020

@retrospace111 has appealed a punishment received from HO, found here. The appeals committee (myself, @iamslm22, @bovovovo, @Bzerkap, @Bwestfield, @manicmav36, and @Laser) reviewed evidence from HO and from retrospace, and have decided unanimously to uphold the punishment given by HO.

While the committee agrees that the comment in question could have been intended as a joke, it is easy to see how it could be interpreted as more of an invitation. The committee also disagrees that this being a single post, rather than a string of connected comments as found in precedent, is grounds to reduce the punishment.

Any questions regarding this decision may be directed to myself or any other member of the appeals team.

retrospace111 Appeals Decision - retrospace111 - 05-27-2020

Quote: The committee also disagrees that this being a single post, rather than a string of connected comments as found in precedent, is grounds to reduce the punishment.

A single joke gets the same punishment as a full blown tampering incident with multiple contact between player and GM?

What a joke

retrospace111 Appeals Decision - Warner - 05-28-2020

(05-27-2020, 12:23 PM)retrospace111 Wrote:What a joke
Eh I disagree it really wasn't that funny