[DEV] ISFL Forums
*A look at stat priorities for Defensive Linemen. - Printable Version

+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Graded Statistical Analysis (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=153)
+---- Thread: *A look at stat priorities for Defensive Linemen. (/showthread.php?tid=4284)

*A look at stat priorities for Defensive Linemen. - 7hawk77 - 09-07-2017

Hello again.

It's been a while since I've last done one of these. I've decided to take a look at defensive linemen again. For this, I've kept the initial season 1 data and then added the season 2 data as well to get more data for my correlated attributes to stats.


I would like to note that I did normalize player values that did not play 14 games. I threw out a few players that obviously didn't start for the games they "played" as to not screw up the data.

Anyways, here we go!


S2 Player stats:

[Image: gHWyFxt.png]

S2 Player Attributes:

[Image: E66CVpa.png]


New tackling coefficients.

[Image: j1lRwxX.png]

Note that this is combining all of the data from season 1 and season 2.

New Tackle for loss coefficients.

[Image: NNKcRtu.png]

New Forced Fumble coefficients.

[Image: qFRJDGx.png]

New Sack coefficients.

[Image: HWZJoKD.png]


Updated archetype analysis breakdown:

[Image: brGALIF.png]

For this I'm only looking at the max of the attributes and only using significant and positively correlated attributes to calculate the aggregate scores below:


[Image: gD4ZlQJ.png]



And finally, the moment you've all been waiting for..... Did the DT rework actually balance the archetypes?

[Image: K4Dgg0L.png]

Looks like it.

Nose tackle looks a little bit worse on here, however I believe that since it is the heaviest archetype, it actually gets a slight boost to it's final ranking. Also, since it has a niche roll compared to the other defensive tackles, it seems fine to me.

I think that if any of the archetypes had fallen below 95% then it might be cause for concern. I'm definitely pleased.


Anyways, this has less analysis than the last time I posted all of this information so please feel free to ask me any questions.


Cheers

-Dan/Lord Nibbler-


Shoutout to my sabercat D-Line:

@okonkwoco
@Lendoris
@Ducks
@BypassedSal


Edit: I typo'd. Interior rusher is the best sacker. That should be a #1 not a #3.


I also decided to add the Defensive End archetype break down:

[Image: 5uC0fLW.png]

[Image: CKY1npn.png]

*A look at stat priorities for Defensive Linemen. - Lendoris - 09-07-2017

(09-07-2017, 11:18 AM)7hawk77 Wrote:Hello again.

It's been a while since I've last done one of these. I've decided to take a look at defensive linemen again. For this, I've kept the initial season 1 data and then added the season 2 data as well to get more data for my correlated attributes to stats.


I would like to note that I did normalize player values that did not play 14 games. I threw out a few players that obviously didn't start for the games they "played" as to not screw up the data.

Anyways, here we go!


S2 Player stats:

[Image: gHWyFxt.png]

S2 Player Attributes:

[Image: E66CVpa.png]


New tackling coefficients.

[Image: j1lRwxX.png]

Note that this is combining all of the data from season 1 and season 2.

New Tackle for loss coefficients.

[Image: NNKcRtu.png]

New Forced Fumble coefficients.

[Image: qFRJDGx.png]

New Sack coefficients.

[Image: HWZJoKD.png]


Updated archetype analysis breakdown:

[Image: brGALIF.png]

For this I'm only looking at the max of the attributes and only using significant and positively correlated attributes to calculate the aggregate scores below:


[Image: gD4ZlQJ.png]



And finally, the moment you've all been waiting for..... Did the DT rework actually balance the archetypes?

[Image: K4Dgg0L.png]

Looks like it.

Nose tackle looks a little bit worse on here, however I believe that since it is the heaviest archetype, it actually gets a slight boost to it's final ranking. Also, since it has a niche roll compared to the other defensive tackles, it seems fine to me.

I think that if any of the archetypes had fallen below 95% then it might be cause for concern. I'm definitely pleased.


Anyways, this has less analysis than the last time I posted all of this information so please feel free to ask me any questions.


Cheers

-Dan/Lord Nibbler-


Shoutout to my sabercat D-Line:

@okonkwoco
@Lendoris
@Ducks
@BypassedSal



Oorah

*A look at stat priorities for Defensive Linemen. - 7hawk77 - 09-07-2017

Figured I'd tag @Ballerstorm to show that the DT archetypes balance seems to be going well.



*A look at stat priorities for Defensive Linemen. - Admin - 09-07-2017

(09-07-2017, 11:18 AM)7hawk77 Wrote:Figured I'd tag @Ballerstorm to show that the DT archetypes balance seems to be going well.
That's great to hear

*A look at stat priorities for Defensive Linemen. - 7hawk77 - 09-07-2017

Added Defensive End archetype breakdown in OP.

It's Also balanced. In the future I might look in to DT vs DE.


*A look at stat priorities for Defensive Linemen. - ErMurazor - 09-07-2017

Am I not in the data?

*A look at stat priorities for Defensive Linemen. - BOOM™ - 09-08-2017

Great breakdown.

*A look at stat priorities for Defensive Linemen. - 7hawk77 - 09-08-2017

(09-07-2017, 04:22 PM)ErMurazor Wrote:Am I not in the data?

I'll double check what happened.

*A look at stat priorities for Defensive Linemen. - 7hawk77 - 09-08-2017

(09-07-2017, 04:22 PM)ErMurazor Wrote:Am I not in the data?

Apparently you were the only defensive linemen I skipped when importing your stats. I had your attributes but I didn't map them to the stats since I missed you.


I added you and it really didn't effect my results. Stat priority for all of the stats are the same except forced fumble coefficients.

It is now : Strength> Agility>Tackling>Endurance>Speed>Intelligence
from
Strength> Agility>Tackling>Endurance>Intelligence>Speed

Probably irrelevant either way. Fumbles seem pretty random/high variance.

*A look at stat priorities for Defensive Linemen. - ErMurazor - 09-08-2017

(09-08-2017, 02:17 PM)7hawk77 Wrote:Apparently you were the only defensive linemen I skipped when importing your stats. I had your attributes but I didn't map them to the stats since I missed you.


I added you and it really didn't effect my results. Stat priority for all of the stats are the same except forced fumble coefficients.

It is now : Strength> Agility>Tackling>Endurance>Speed>Intelligence
from
Strength> Agility>Tackling>Endurance>Intelligence>Speed

Probably irrelevant either way. Fumbles seem pretty random/high variance.

Touche. Get stuff regardless man!