I will agree that active players NEED to take precedent over an inactive. For this league to grow and thrive, we need to active players and it all starts with the DSFL. Active player retention has been a big hurdle for us in the past. It's no surprise that Portland and San Antonio have the most active players and their players get drafted the highest when you look at their front offices.
I also agree that DSFL players should all just receive a flat contract for their rookie season. This would take out the need for negotiations, and animosity when players are getting different amounts. This also alleviates the GMs of an extra, unnecessary responsibility and frees up some time for more important tasks. The fact that this wasn't changed after the former Blues GM exploited the system is still a shock to me.
I also agree that DSFL players should all just receive a flat contract for their rookie season. This would take out the need for negotiations, and animosity when players are getting different amounts. This also alleviates the GMs of an extra, unnecessary responsibility and frees up some time for more important tasks. The fact that this wasn't changed after the former Blues GM exploited the system is still a shock to me.
[div align=center][/select]![[Image: RhrM963.png]](https://i.imgur.com/RhrM963.png)
[div align=center]
![[Image: RhrM963.png]](https://i.imgur.com/RhrM963.png)
[div align=center]