(01-17-2018, 09:47 AM)kckolbe Wrote:You have no clue what you want. First off, most of my cap was gone because I paid my rookies 5 mil, not because I had a ton of expensive inactives. Rookies aren't sitting behind inactives, so the shadowed by better players argument holds no water.
You say it is too much work to manage an inactive (how is that work, btw), but updating your entire team every week isnt?
Going against an opponent who has a high TPE inactives definitely overshadows an active player who isn't quite there yet in TPE.
It is work to manage inactives because you have to monitor transactions when an NSFL team is sending someone down or we have the 'Send Down' draft before each season. It just adds more overhead to a job that should be focused on giving new players a fun and engaging experience while preparing them for the NSFL. My plan isn't to update the entire team each week, but to update a few players at certain intervals. Again, this is all brainstorming but the key here is that we want to get rid of inactives from the DSFL entirely.
