Are there any reasons to actually keep inactives on rosters? I haven't seen a legitimate scenario other than the possibility of someone returning in sapp's example.
I believe this idea aligns with the goals of a DSFL GM. Our job isn't to be competitive, but to keep the interest of new players first and being able to craft a team around newly drafted actives would help us showcase our active players and generate excitement for each new user. If this isn't the case, I'd like HO to step in and fully define what our role is since that's the assumption I was operating on.
I believe this idea aligns with the goals of a DSFL GM. Our job isn't to be competitive, but to keep the interest of new players first and being able to craft a team around newly drafted actives would help us showcase our active players and generate excitement for each new user. If this isn't the case, I'd like HO to step in and fully define what our role is since that's the assumption I was operating on.
