(01-23-2018, 05:54 PM)Battleborn Wrote:Unbalanced player distribution throughout positions isn't entirely a bad thing. For those who choose to be a RB (example of a shorter career) will be able to retire and recreate sooner. Other positions may last longer, but it seems as though creators tend to get bored with their players before regression really sets in anyway. Just a thought I have as to why regression rates for different positions could be beneficial and add to the realism.
The position of running back would actually be a great example of why not too. The position is already highly ineffective, and many teams are all but abandoning the run. Teams like Orange County and Arizona have a pass to run ratio of 3:1. It's very possible we may not have a single RB with over 1000 yards rushing this season. So taking an ineffective position, and regressing it earlier than most would just exacerbate the issue.
![[Image: bam_bam.png]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/742845006389444778/780215137557807124/bam_bam.png)
[OPTION]Johnny Snuggles || CB || Yellowknife Wraiths || Hall of Fame [OPTION]Height/Weight: 6'1", 205 [OPTION]Number: 21 [OPTION] Draft History: S13 #1 Overall [OPTION]=========================================== [OPTION]Trophy Case/Achievements:[OPTION] Ultimini Champs: S12 [OPTION] Defensive Rookie of the Year: S13 [OPTION] Pro Bowl: S14, S15, S16