[DEV] ISFL Forums
*S8 Rule Proposals that didn’t pass - Printable Version

+- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Media (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Graded Articles (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+---- Thread: *S8 Rule Proposals that didn’t pass (/showthread.php?tid=9651)

Pages: 1 2

*S8 Rule Proposals that didn’t pass - Raven - 07-19-2018

(07-19-2018, 03:20 PM)kckolbe Wrote:I remember that before we went to OL bots, we had a thread where pretty much every active OL posted in it and said they would be happy switching.  Maybe we should post a thread for kickers to weigh in on whether they would want to change if kicker bots were implemented?

I said no to switching aswell

*S8 Rule Proposals that didn’t pass - kckolbe - 07-19-2018

(07-19-2018, 02:38 PM)Raven Wrote:I said no to switching aswell

You were the first one I thought of, and I figured it'd be a no.

*S8 Rule Proposals that didn’t pass - run_CMC - 07-19-2018

(07-19-2018, 03:02 PM)Bzerkap Wrote:We never see head office votes
We got to see Oles’ cause he posted in the GM thread

*S8 Rule Proposals that didn’t pass - Bzerkap - 07-19-2018

(07-19-2018, 02:47 PM)run_CMC Wrote:We got to see Oles’ cause he posted in the GM thread
What a loser

*S8 Rule Proposals that didn’t pass - dropbear - 07-19-2018

I think that preventing the DSFL from being a draft-and-stash system while players get their TPE up would make the draft a lot more interesting. Especially if their was a rookie pay scale or something (though that's a whole other story). But it's not likely GMs are ever going to vote to handicap themselves.

Also, the carryover cap is a great idea. Good cap management should be rewarded. Hopefully that passes in the future because to me that's something GMs should be excited about

*S8 Rule Proposals that didn’t pass - bovovovo - 07-19-2018

(07-19-2018, 05:20 PM)dropbear Wrote:I think that preventing the DSFL from being a draft-and-stash system while players get their TPE up would make the draft a lot more interesting. Especially if their was a rookie pay scale or something (though that's a whole other story). But it's not likely GMs are ever going to vote to handicap themselves.

Also, the carryover cap is a great idea. Good cap management should be rewarded. Hopefully that passes in the future because to me that's something GMs should be excited about

Biggest concern with the DSFL pay thing was worry that it would result in lots of players going completely undrafted

*S8 Rule Proposals that didn’t pass - Bzerkap - 07-19-2018

(07-19-2018, 03:25 PM)bovovovo Wrote:Biggest concern with the DSFL pay thing was worry that it would result in lots of players going completely undrafted
The biggest issue is there aren't always players at every position every year like in the NFL. Not even mentioning the fact that there is barely one active player per position per year. Divide that up among eight teams and you've got the reason we have to draft and stash.

EDIT: Also, other than a few positions it's almost impossible for even a first rounder to be a relevant player in the NSFL in their draft year

*S8 Rule Proposals that didn’t pass - speculadora - 07-19-2018

(07-19-2018, 06:20 PM)dropbear Wrote:I think that preventing the DSFL from being a draft-and-stash system while players get their TPE up would make the draft a lot more interesting. Especially if their was a rookie pay scale or something (though that's a whole other story). But it's not likely GMs are ever going to vote to handicap themselves.

Also, the carryover cap is a great idea. Good cap management should be rewarded. Hopefully that passes in the future because to me that's something GMs should be excited about

what are we defining as good cap management though? should SJS and PHI get to just build their cap up because they don't plan on being competitive in the immediate future? also people love to talk about how players should be paid more or take bigger contracts, but this would actively disincentivize teams to offer those.