![]() |
LB3737 Tampering Punishment - Printable Version +- [DEV] ISFL Forums (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums) +-- Forum: League Office (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Punishments (http://dev.sim-football.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=279) +--- Thread: LB3737 Tampering Punishment (/showthread.php?tid=28196) |
RE: LB3737 Tampering Punishment - infinitempg - 12-09-2020 (12-09-2020, 01:45 PM)DeadlyPlayer Wrote: Should've just posted nsfw memes, at least then it would've been fun and you would've gotten nearly the same punishment. <3 you LB brb going to fine Deadly again ![]() RE: LB3737 Tampering Punishment - platanocat - 12-09-2020 [ Everyone Hated That ] RE: LB3737 Tampering Punishment - Frostbite - 12-09-2020 #FreeLB RE: LB3737 Tampering Punishment - DeadlyPlayer - 12-09-2020 (12-09-2020, 01:47 PM)infinitempg Wrote:don't even think about it bucko :reeee:(12-09-2020, 01:45 PM)DeadlyPlayer Wrote: Should've just posted nsfw memes, at least then it would've been fun and you would've gotten nearly the same punishment. <3 you LB RE: LB3737 Tampering Punishment - siddhus - 12-09-2020 Fr? RE: LB3737 Tampering Punishment - LB3737 - 12-09-2020 ![]() RE: LB3737 Tampering Punishment - platanocat - 12-09-2020 If I am voted in as DSFL Commissioner, I will push for a rule change that all players are tamperable unless they explicitly sign a no tamper clause in their contract. RE: LB3737 Tampering Punishment - DeadlyPlayer - 12-09-2020 (12-09-2020, 01:56 PM)platanocat Wrote: If I am voted in as DSFL Commissioner, I will push for a rule change that all players are tamperable unless they explicitly sign a no tamper clause in their contract.okay Mr.IA RE: LB3737 Tampering Punishment - JKortesi81 - 12-09-2020 This is stupid. RE: LB3737 Tampering Punishment - ReverendOReily - 12-09-2020 (12-09-2020, 01:32 PM)infinitempg Wrote:(12-09-2020, 01:29 PM)ReverendOReily Wrote: If there is no process for a player in the DSFL to leave one team for another (outside of those teams making a trade with each other), why is tampering a thing in the DSFL? What negative thing could have possibly arose from LB's comment? Are we afraid the player he "tampered" is going to request a trade? Last I checked, GM's are allowed to say no to trades. But even in this scenario, GM's don't have any obligation to accept the demanded trade, right? If this is the scenario that necessitates tampering penalties in the DSFL, why are we seeing such a harsh punishment on what is obviously a much less severe example of tampering? If the answer is as simple as "because tampering is tampering" then oof. It's just a shame someone who is still pretty new to the site is getting dunked on because of this similar but clearly completely different scenario. |