LB3737 Tampering Punishment

[infinitempg]

Should've just posted nsfw memes, at least then it would've been fun and you would've gotten nearly the same punishment. <3 you LB

brb going to fine Deadly again

[platanocat]

[ Everyone Hated That ]

[Frostbite]

#FreeLB

[DeadlyPlayer]

Should've just posted nsfw memes, at least then it would've been fun and you would've gotten nearly the same punishment. <3 you LB

brb going to fine Deadly again

don't even think about it bucko :reeee:

[siddhus]

Fr?

[LB3737]

[platanocat]

If I am voted in as DSFL Commissioner, I will push for a rule change that all players are tamperable unless they explicitly sign a no tamper clause in their contract.

[DeadlyPlayer]

If I am voted in as DSFL Commissioner, I will push for a rule change that all players are tamperable unless they explicitly sign a no tamper clause in their contract.

okay Mr.IA

[JKortesi81]

This is stupid.

[ReverendOReily]

If there is no process for a player in the DSFL to leave one team for another (outside of those teams making a trade with each other), why is tampering a thing in the DSFL? What negative thing could have possibly arose from LB's comment? Are we afraid the player he "tampered" is going to request a trade? Last I checked, GM's are allowed to say no to trades.

"Hey man just bank all of your TPE while you're on your team and demand a trade to my team!"

But even in this scenario, GM's don't have any obligation to accept the demanded trade, right? If this is the scenario that necessitates tampering penalties in the DSFL, why are we seeing such a harsh punishment on what is obviously a much less severe example of tampering? If the answer is as simple as "because tampering is tampering" then oof. 

It's just a shame someone who is still pretty new to the site is getting dunked on because of this similar but clearly completely different scenario.