Agent Ruling

[AdamS]

I think the "you cant have a player or be a GM" thing can work as long as that's what it actually is.

If this turns into a fun thing people do and they actually use agents and it turns out to be a "we wrote this because we figured no one would actually want to do it if it cost them the ability to have an active player" and then suddenly the rules get shifted again....there will be words.

So I'm putting this out there..if you're going to kill it in its 100% entirety..then write the rule that does that NOW. Make your call and take the result. Don't move the goalposts later.

[ADwyer87]

I think the "you cant have a player or be a GM" thing can work as long as that's what it actually is.

If this turns into a fun thing people do and they actually use agents and it turns out to be a "we wrote this because we figured no one would actually want to do it if it cost them the ability to have an active player" and then suddenly the rules get shifted again....there will be words.

So I'm putting this out there..if you're going to kill it in its 100% entirety..then write the rule that does that NOW. Make your call and take the result. Don't move the goalposts later.

we're talking about it further in HO

currently im of the mind that was posted in the OP:

Having these things along with being an agent creates a conflict of interest, which would clearly fall under tampering

but i am just one person in the HO

[Radsin]

Dead ass was hoping to have Er net me a big contract once i made my player real good and hit the FA. I'm too nice to do it myself, and this has cost me MILLIONS in my eyes.

Future me is gonna be maaaaaaaaaad

Edit - that kinda sucks but, i get why. would have been fun if done right tho