(02-26-2018, 08:50 AM)DeathOnReddit Wrote:Are you guys serious? I can see now you will complain about anything. He broke the rules, plain and simple.Except he didn't. He broke HO's interpretation of the rules - and if there's room to interpret a rule, the rule is poor.
If it's so plain and simple, then please list all things that are valid reasoning and all things that are not, such that it would be agreed upon by 100% of people. If such a thing can't be done, then the phrase "valid reasoning" should either not be in a rule, or should be further defined.
![[Image: Bogdon.png]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/404149533220667398/415968555893522462/Bogdon.png)
