(02-26-2018, 10:25 AM)Squamish Wrote:Because valid reasoning is not defined within the rule. Therefore, he did not break the rule, as it can be argued for or against valid reasoning.
Valid reasoning is "His position was wrong" valid reasoning isnt "It was for a project/article/ImAnIdiotAndDecidedToChangeItBecauseOCD
![[Image: bxKqp91.png]](https://i.imgur.com/bxKqp91.png)