(12-13-2018, 04:36 PM)bovovovo Wrote:Good stuff. Few initial thoughts:
1. Not reaching out to you was obviously a mistake and is something we’re going to try to not repeat in the future
I get that, but nothing wrong with adding a failsafe to make sure.
(12-13-2018, 04:36 PM)bovovovo Wrote:2. I think you’re underestimating how thorough we as a group try to be when considering punishments.
I believe you, actually, just like I think you believe I wasn't actually trying to leak draft info. But unconscious biases are a difficult animal to quantify.
(12-13-2018, 04:36 PM)bovovovo Wrote:3. I think attaching vote results to announcements is a good idea actually... I’d be hesitant to attach names to votes because that’d probably do more harm and cause more drama than it’d be worth but even just attaching a “by a 4-2 vote” or whatever could be good for transparency
I get the reluctance, really. But I don't think it's a bad thing for those things to be known, and when I would release HO votes in PBE to GMs, not once were any HO members attacked for their votes. What MIGHT happen is members being attacked if they are consistently seen not voting at all.
![[Image: BVsashy.png]](https://i.imgur.com/BVsashy.png)