(11-22-2019, 03:17 PM)infinitempg Wrote:I think if we do go with an awards committee they should essentially nominate 3-4 people for each award and list relevant stats. it would help get rid of unanimous awards being completely boring in the presentation and might allow GMs to see players that they overlook. And of course if the committee overlooks someone the GMs can always add extra nominations. the committee wont vote but simply make the GMs lives a little easier and help shine light on players that mightve been overlooked
I think if they did all that, they would vote as well.
It's good to step outside the insulated world of "I'm right because I'm in charge and I'm in charge because I'm right" that sometimes occurs. Sometimes people are so in love with their own opinion that they don't see the need for other opinions.
![[Image: 68.png]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/722696337912496132/759304283312881684/68.png)