03-16-2020, 03:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-16-2020, 03:34 PM by iStegosauruz.)
(03-16-2020, 12:43 PM)HENDRIX 2.0 Wrote:Raw sacks surrendered doesn't mean much. NOLA runs a ton, so they will be low. Sack % would be more informative.
Sack%=((sacks allowed)/(passing attempts + sacks allowed))*100
Fair, I was just grabbing the numbers I had available already.
When you weight it by sack% it looks like this:
![[Image: 8NqGzl0.png]](https://i.imgur.com/8NqGzl0.png)
NOLA is 2.28% lower than the next lowest and 3.61% lower than the average of 7.19%. In terms of Sack% metric the stats hold.
What I think is really interesting from that is the Sabercats. They're the only team who currently pays for 750TPE bot offensive linemen - although only one is listed on my sheet as a tackle (310lbs) - and they have the worst sack% there by 2.86% over the average.
I tossed in yards per rush attempt too as an additional metric that normally factors into the valuation of offensive lines - not sure how it works in sim - and NOLA is fourth on that.
![[Image: bZJ57LU.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/bZJ57LU.gif)