Jiggly Tampering Punishment

[AdamS]

Jiggly was instructed directly that he needed to contact GMs before speaking with players, as always required and as shown in the screenshot from the article. He chose not to. So...

So you mean at the beginning of the process. Maybe I'm reading this wrong.

Because what I'm seeing is that permission was already given. Conversations were already happening and then when your move didn't work and people just continued talking (literally within the same 40 hour period) you decided that the 2nd part not only existed (since you randomly decreed it) but that it merited punishment (which again..was a continuation of the 1st with permission that had literally just been given already).

So maybe I'm seeing it wrong here and you didn't punish someone because you demanded a 2nd round of permissions for the same existing conversations in the same time frame.